Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBanik, Dande
dc.contributor.authorBull, Benedictede
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-09T07:28:43Z
dc.date.available2022-08-09T07:28:43Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn2566-6878de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/80685
dc.description.abstractDuring the global COVID-19 crisis, China has portrayed itself as a "champion of multilateralism" - defending UN institutions and its own multilateral initiatives in a variety of spheres. China’s approach has, however, often been criticised for undermining multilateralism through its use of multilateral platforms as arenas to contest US leadership. This paper examines the official Chinese discourse on multilateralism during the COVID 19 crisis in the years 2020 and 2021 in light of Beijing’s multilateral diplomacy in the Global South, exemplified by the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) and the China-CELAC Forum (China-Community of Latin American and Caribbean States Forum). The authors argue that China’s growing multilateral engagement must be understood in the context of a multilateral system that was already in crisis before the pandemic due to its inability to resolve major global challenges. The term "multilateralism" is essentially used by Beijing to discursively oppose "unilateralism". While its active multilateral engagement may be able to prevent and resolve major global crises in the future, Beijing's approach offers limited multilateral spaces for deliberation and contestation by weaker states and non-state actode
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.subject.otherCOVID-19 crisis; FOCAC; CELAC; CCFde
dc.titleMultilateralism to the Rescue? Beijing’s Support for Multilateral Institutions during the COVID-19 Crisisde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://hasp.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/iqas/article/view/14102de
dc.source.journalInternational Quarterly for Asian Studies (IQAS)
dc.source.volume53de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozMultilateralitätde
dc.subject.thesozmultilateralismen
dc.subject.thesozDiplomatiede
dc.subject.thesozdiplomacyen
dc.subject.thesozAußenpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozforeign policyen
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Zusammenarbeitde
dc.subject.thesozinternational cooperationen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10052745
internal.identifier.thesoz10037465
internal.identifier.thesoz10034694
internal.identifier.thesoz10037395
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo207-230de
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.journal2245
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc327
dc.source.issuetopicChina beyond China, Part Ide
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.11588/iqas.2022.2.14102de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://crossasia-journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/iqas/oai@@oai:ojs.crossasia-journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de:article/14102
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record