Download full text
(external source)
Citation Suggestion
Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420935555
Exports for your reference manager
The Limits of "Populism": How Malaysia Misses the Mark and Why That Matters
[journal article]
Abstract Politics in Malaysia seems ripe for a populist upsurge. Parties assume fairly exclusive, ethnic boundaries, inviting insider-outsider pandering. Personalities loom large. Economic inequality is among the highest in the region. Regardless, the extent to which Malaysian politics might be understood as... view more
Politics in Malaysia seems ripe for a populist upsurge. Parties assume fairly exclusive, ethnic boundaries, inviting insider-outsider pandering. Personalities loom large. Economic inequality is among the highest in the region. Regardless, the extent to which Malaysian politics might be understood as "populist" rather than merely polarised, illiberal, and prone to particularism is dubious. I argue that Malaysian politics is neither populist nor likely to veer that way. However, the case offers a useful test of the boundaries between populism and personalisation of politics, the extent to which appeals designed to maximise popular support suffice to code a polity as populist, and which specific illiberal features facilitate or preclude populism. This examination thus clarifies a messy concept by exploring how populism might develop or falter in a multi-party, parliamentary, and hybrid rather than democratic regime - suggesting the relative reach of institutional rather than personalistic or zeitgeist-related explanations.... view less
Classification
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture
Free Keywords
Malaysia; populism; patronage; illiberalism; inequality
Document language
English
Publication Year
2020
Page/Pages
p. 207-226
Journal
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 39 (2020) 2
ISSN
1868-4882
Status
Published Version; peer reviewed