Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorStaar, Benedikt Christophde
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-06T08:59:50Z
dc.date.available2022-07-06T08:59:50Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn2566-6878de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/79790
dc.description.abstractDespite the growing literature on the securitisation of North Korea, securitisation in the authoritarian state has been understudied thus far. Through analysing North Korean primary sources, this article presents the complexity of North Korean securitisation by examining how the United States is securitised in the North Korean newspaper Rodong Sinmun and by North Korea’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, looking at data from between 2017 and 2020. By expanding a framework that is centred in the illocutionary logic of securitising speech acts and by incorporating socio-political authority into its analysis, this article shows that securitisation in North Korea goes beyond the sole purpose of leader-legitimation. Instead, North Korea strategically (de)securitises by having certain governmental speakers utilise only specific strands of securitisation in such a way that potential contradictory changes in securitisation content do not substantially harm the credibility of the North Korean leadership. As a result, if there is a political, economic or other gain to be had, the North Korean government can change its depiction of the US with a negligible legitimacy loss and can comparatively easily resecuritise the US again when external conditions change.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.subject.otherSecuritisation; resecuritisation; non-democratic securitisation; North Korea; North Korean media; autocratic legitimacyde
dc.titleHow to Treat Your Sworn Enemy: North Korea's Securitisation of the United Statesde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://hasp.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/iqas/article/view/14561de
dc.source.journalInternational Quarterly for Asian Studies (IQAS)
dc.source.volume52de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.source.issue1-2de
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo79-98de
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.journal2245
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc327
dc.source.issuetopicThe Governing of (In)Security: Politics and Securitisation in the Asian Contextde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.11588/iqas.2021.1-2.14561de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://crossasia-journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/iqas/oai@@oai:ojs.crossasia-journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de:article/14561
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record