Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorOngena, Yfke P.de
dc.contributor.authorHaan, Mariekede
dc.contributor.authorKwee, Thomas C.de
dc.contributor.authorYakar, Deryade
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-03T09:25:27Z
dc.date.available2022-06-03T09:25:27Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn2296-4754de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/79516
dc.description.abstractAlthough waiting room surveys are frequently conducted, methodological studies on this topic are scarce. Behaviour of surveyors in waiting rooms can easily be controlled, and these surveys also allow for collection of paradata; relevant information on the circumstances of a request to participate in survey research. In this paper, we present the results of an experiment systematically manipulating surveyor’s handshakes and verbal introduction of their names. Patients scheduled for radiological examinations were approached to take part in a survey. An observer noted circumstances in the waiting room (CT or MRI) such as the number of people present. In the CT waiting room, willingness to participate was higher when no other people were filling out the survey than when there were other people filling out the survey. Thus, scarcity effects seemed to play a major role in the decision to participate. In addition, a patient waiting alone was more likely to fully complete the questionnaire, than patients accompanied by one or more caregivers. There was no effect of the surveyor’s handshake or verbal name introduction on survey participation, which is a fortunate outcome in light of social distances measures fighting COVID-19.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherintercept surveys; persuasion strategies; unit nonresponse; waiting room surveysde
dc.titleShaking hands in a busy waiting room: The effects of the surveyor’s introduction and people present in the waiting room on the response ratede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Methods: Insights from the Field
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozBefragungde
dc.subject.thesozsurveyen
dc.subject.thesozPatientde
dc.subject.thesozpatienten
dc.subject.thesozTeilnehmerde
dc.subject.thesozparticipanten
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10037910
internal.identifier.thesoz10049928
internal.identifier.thesoz10060100
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal472
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2021-00002de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record