Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorStassen, Gerritde
dc.contributor.authorRudolf, Kevinde
dc.contributor.authorGernert, Madeleinede
dc.contributor.authorThiel, Ansgarde
dc.contributor.authorSchaller, Andreade
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-25T11:39:51Z
dc.date.available2022-05-25T11:39:51Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/79414
dc.description.abstractBackground: Since prevalence estimates of recommended physical activity (PA) considerably vary between different surveys, prevalence might be crucially affected by the choice of measuring instrument. The aim of the present study is to compare the results of four PA questionnaires regarding the current moderate- and vigorous-intensity aerobic PA (MVPA) recommendations of the World Health Organization. Methods: Within an online survey, participants answered the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS), the European Health Interview Survey PA Questionnaire (EHIS), the Eurobarometer (EURO), and a single-item measure (SIM). Weekly volume of MVPA was compared via a Friedman test and the prevalence of participants achieving the WHO’s MVPA recommendation via Cochran’s Q. Agreement between all questionnaire pairs was evaluated via Kappa statistics. Results: One hundred seventy-six participants were included in the analyses (70.5% female, mean age: 33.1 years (SD=12.2)). Between the four questionnaires, the weekly volume of MVPA statistically significant differed (SIM: MED=90.0 (MIN=0.0, MAX=210.0), DEGS: MED=120.0 (MIN=0.0, MAX=420.0), EHIS: MED=240.0 (MIN=0.0, MAX=1395.0), EURO: MED=510.0 (MIN=0.0, MAX=2430.0), p<.001, all pairwise comparisons p<.01), as well as the prevalence of participants achieving the MVPA recommendations (SIM 31.3% (95% CI 24.5–38.7), DEGS 43.2% (95% CI 35.8–50.8), EHIS 67.0% (95% CI 59.6–73.9), EURO 87.5% (95% CI 81.7–92.0), p<.001), except between SIM and DEGS (p=.067). Agreement was weak between all questionnaire pairs (all κ< 0.60). Conclusions: Questionnaire choice crucially affects the resulting MVPA data and hence the prevalence of achieving recommended PA levels within the same sample. Therefore, for PA surveillance, standardised survey and analysis methods and efforts to harmonise monitoring systems are needed, since whether recommended levels of PA are achieved should not be determined by the choice of one measuring instrument or another.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcMedizin und Gesundheitde
dc.subject.ddcMedicine and healthen
dc.subject.otherPhysical activity; Recommendations; Surveillance; ZA5877: Eurobarometer 80.2 (2013) (Data file Version 2.0.0)de
dc.titleQuestionnaire choice affects the prevalence of recommended physical activity: an online survey comparing four measuring instruments within the same samplede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalBMC Public Health
dc.source.volume21de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.classozGesundheitspolitikde
dc.subject.classozHealth Policyen
dc.subject.classozMedizin, Sozialmedizinde
dc.subject.classozMedicine, Social Medicineen
dc.subject.thesozkörperliche Bewegungde
dc.subject.thesozphysical exerciseen
dc.subject.thesozMessungde
dc.subject.thesozmeasurementen
dc.subject.thesozMessinstrumentde
dc.subject.thesozmeasurement instrumenten
dc.subject.thesozBeurteilungde
dc.subject.thesozassessmenten
dc.subject.thesozMethodikde
dc.subject.thesozmethodologyen
dc.subject.thesozEpidemiologiede
dc.subject.thesozepidemiologyen
dc.subject.thesozObservationde
dc.subject.thesozsurveillanceen
dc.subject.thesozMonitoringde
dc.subject.thesozmonitoringen
dc.subject.thesozBefragungde
dc.subject.thesozsurveyen
dc.subject.thesozOnline-Befragungde
dc.subject.thesozonline surveyen
dc.subject.thesozEurobarometerde
dc.subject.thesozEurobarometeren
dc.subject.thesozVergleichde
dc.subject.thesozcomparisonen
dc.subject.thesozDatende
dc.subject.thesozdataen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-79414-5
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10086741
internal.identifier.thesoz10036930
internal.identifier.thesoz10041769
internal.identifier.thesoz10039052
internal.identifier.thesoz10052211
internal.identifier.thesoz10042428
internal.identifier.thesoz10053508
internal.identifier.thesoz10096447
internal.identifier.thesoz10037910
internal.identifier.thesoz10037911
internal.identifier.thesoz10083052
internal.identifier.thesoz10047774
internal.identifier.thesoz10034708
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-12de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.classoz11006
internal.identifier.classoz50100
internal.identifier.journal2013
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
internal.identifier.ddc610
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10113-9de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort10100de
dc.subject.classhort50100de
dc.subject.classhort11000de
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record