Volltext herunterladen
(externe Quelle)
Zitationshinweis
Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2576
Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung
The Organizational Engine of Rankings: Connecting "New" and "Old" Institutionalism
[Zeitschriftenartikel]
Abstract When explaining the ubiquity of rankings, researchers tend to emphasize macro or contextual phenomena, such as the power of or the trust in numbers, neoliberal forces, or a general spirit of competition. Meanwhile, the properties of rankers are rarely, if at all, taken into account. In contrast to t... mehr
When explaining the ubiquity of rankings, researchers tend to emphasize macro or contextual phenomena, such as the power of or the trust in numbers, neoliberal forces, or a general spirit of competition. Meanwhile, the properties of rankers are rarely, if at all, taken into account. In contrast to the received wisdom, we argue that the institutionalization of rankings in different fields is also contingent upon another, often-neglected factor: Over time, rankers have become increasingly more organized. To investigate the role of ranking organizations, we look into the distinct properties of present-day rankings and highlight three dimensions along which rankings have evolved over the course of the twentieth century, namely, publication frequency, handling complex tasks, and audience engagement. On this basis, we argue that these dimensions have to a large extent been affected by formal organization and we show how ranking organizations have over time developed capacities to: (a) publish rankings on a continual basis; (b) handle the often complex production process by means of division of labor; and (c) generate considerable degrees of attention by addressing large and diverse audiences. On a more general note, we argue that accounting for the role of organization in the instutionalization of rankings requires a combination of insights from both “old” and “new” strands of thinking in institutional theory.... weniger
Thesaurusschlagwörter
Ranking; Methode; Organisation; Quantifizierung; Institutionalisierung; empirische Forschung; Institution
Klassifikation
Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften
Freie Schlagwörter
audiences; institutions; organizations; quantification; rankings
Sprache Dokument
Englisch
Publikationsjahr
2020
Seitenangabe
S. 36-47
Zeitschriftentitel
Politics and Governance, 8 (2020) 2
Heftthema
Quantifying Higher Education: Governing Universities and Academics by Numbers
ISSN
2183-2463
Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)