Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorRinscheid, Adriande
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T12:16:57Z
dc.date.available2022-04-22T12:16:57Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/78693
dc.description.abstractThis study links voter-centred and interest group perspectives to assess the role structurally powerful businesses can play in contested political issues. Revisiting the literature on business influence in politics, incumbent businesses are theorised to strategically use their structural power to influence voters' preferences. The conceptual framework is illustrated with a case study of a direct democratic vote related to Swiss energy policy. To empirically trace the role incumbent businesses played in the run-up to the vote, the study employs a two-step approach. First, it uses Discourse Network Analysis (DNA) to examine arguments and actor coalitions in the public debate preceding the vote. Second, the DNA results inform a statistical analysis of survey data on voting behaviour. The findings suggest that incumbent businesses can use their structural power strategically to shape voting behaviour. The study stimulates the discussion about political power relationships in societies and enriches the nascent debate about phasing out unsustainable energy infrastructure. Importantly, it opens up ways to combine DNA with other methods, an avenue that shows promise for use and further refinement in future applications.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherDiscourse Network Analysis; Switzerland; business; direct democracy; energy; energy policy; nuclear power; phase-out; preference formation; structural powerde
dc.titleBusiness Power in Noisy Politics: An Exploration Based on Discourse Network Analysis and Survey Datade
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2580de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume8de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozUnternehmende
dc.subject.thesozenterpriseen
dc.subject.thesozEinflussde
dc.subject.thesozinfluenceen
dc.subject.thesozWahlverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozvoting behavioren
dc.subject.thesozSchweizde
dc.subject.thesozSwitzerlanden
dc.subject.thesozEnergiepolitikde
dc.subject.thesozenergy policyen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10039009
internal.identifier.thesoz10037908
internal.identifier.thesoz10061173
internal.identifier.thesoz10057541
internal.identifier.thesoz10042069
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo286-297de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.source.issuetopicPolicy Debates and Discourse Network Analysisde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2580de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2580
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record