Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorJia, Chenyande
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Ruibode
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-24T08:49:07Z
dc.date.available2022-03-24T08:49:07Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2439de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/78192
dc.description.abstractThe relative hostile media effect suggests that partisans tend to perceive the bias of slanted news differently depending on whether the news is slanted in favor of or against their sides. To explore the effect of an algorithmic vs. human source on hostile media perceptions, this study conducts a 3 (author attribution: human, algorithm, or human-assisted algorithm) x 3 (news attitude: pro-issue, neutral, or anti-issue) mixed factorial design online experiment (N = 511). This study uses a transformer-based adversarial network to auto-generate comparable news headlines. The framework was trained with a dataset of 364,986 news stories from 22 mainstream media outlets. The results show that the relative hostile media effect occurs when people read news headlines attributed to all types of authors. News attributed to a sole human source is perceived as more credible than news attributed to two algorithm-related sources. For anti-Trump news headlines, there exists an interaction effect between author attribution and issue partisanship while controlling for people’s prior belief in machine heuristics. The difference of hostile media perceptions between the two partisan groups was relatively larger in anti-Trump news headlines compared with pro-Trump news headlines.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.otheralgorithms; automated journalism; computational method; hostile media effect; source credibilityde
dc.titleAlgorithmic or Human Source? Examining Relative Hostile Media Effect With a Transformer-Based Frameworkde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4164de
dc.source.journalMedia and Communication
dc.source.volume9de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozKommunikatorforschung, Journalismusde
dc.subject.classozCommunicator Research, Journalismen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo170-181de
internal.identifier.classoz1080406
internal.identifier.journal793
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
dc.source.issuetopicAlgorithmic Systems in the Digital Societyde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4164de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4164
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record