dc.contributor.author | Baloğlu, Uğur | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-23T10:13:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-23T10:13:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2183-2439 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/78170 | |
dc.description.abstract | Censorship, banning, and imprisonment are different methods used to suppress dissenting voices in traditional media and have now evolved into a new form with bot and troll accounts in the digital media age in Turkey. Is it possible to construct a bloc with counter-trolls against the escalating political pressure on the media in the post-truth era? Are counter-trolls capable of setting the agenda? This article discusses the possibility of constructing a bloc against the escalating political pressure in Turkey on the media through counter-trolls in the context of communicative rationality. First, it observes the ruling party’s troll politics strategy on Twitter, then examines the counter-discourses against political pressure today; thereafter it analyzes the discourse in hashtags on the agenda of the Boğaziçi University protests. Firstly, 18,000 tweets are examined to understand the suppress-communication strategy of the AK Party trolls. Secondly, the agenda-setting capacity of counter-trolls is observed between January 1, 2020, and February 5, 2021, and 18,000 tweets regarding Boğaziçi protests are examined to analyze the communication strategy of the counter-trolls. The study shows that the populist government instrumentalizes communication in social media, and Twitter does not have enough potential for the Gramscian counter-hegemony, but the organized actions and discourses have the potential to create public opinion. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Publizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesen | de |
dc.subject.ddc | News media, journalism, publishing | en |
dc.subject.other | agenda; civil society; communication strategy; counter‐trolls; populism; troll politics; trolls | de |
dc.title | Trolls, Pressure and Agenda: The discursive fight on Twitter in Turkey | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4213 | de |
dc.source.journal | Media and Communication | |
dc.source.volume | 9 | de |
dc.publisher.country | PRT | de |
dc.source.issue | 4 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | interaktive, elektronische Medien | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Interactive, electronic Media | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Medienpolitik, Informationspolitik, Medienrecht | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Media Politics, Information Politics, Media Law | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 39-51 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 1080404 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 1080411 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 793 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 070 | |
dc.source.issuetopic | Media Control Revisited: Challenges, Bottom-Up Resistance and Agency in the Digital Age | de |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4213 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.dda.reference | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4213 | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |