Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorPérez Dasilva, Jesúsde
dc.contributor.authorMeso Ayerdi, Koldobikade
dc.contributor.authorMendiguren Galdospin, Teresede
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T12:02:34Z
dc.date.available2022-03-17T12:02:34Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2439de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/78094
dc.description.abstractThe term deepfake was first used in a Reddit post in 2017 to refer to videos manipulated using artificial intelligence techniques and since then it is becoming easier to create such fake videos. A recent investigation by the cybersecurity company Deeptrace in September 2019 indicated that the number of what is known as fake videos had doubled in the last nine months and that most were pornographic videos used as revenge to harm many women. The report also highlighted the potential of this technology to be used in political campaigns such as in Gabon and Malaysia. In this sense, the phenomenon of deepfake has become a concern for governments because it poses a short-term threat not only to politics, but also for fraud or cyberbullying. The starting point of this research was Twitter's announcement of a change in its protocols to fight fake news and deepfakes. We have used the Social Network Analysis technique, with visualization as a key component, to analyze the conversation on Twitter about the deepfake phenomenon. NodeXL was used to identify main actors and the network of connections between all these accounts. In addition, the semantic networks of the tweets were analyzed to discover hidden patterns of meaning. The results show that half of the actors who function as bridges in the interactions that shape the network are journalists and media, which is a sign of the concern that this sophisticated form of manipulation generates in this collective.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.otherNodeXL; Social Network Analysis; Twitter; cybersecurity; deepfake; fake news; social mediade
dc.titleDeepfakes on Twitter: Which Actors Control Their Spread?de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3433de
dc.source.journalMedia and Communication
dc.source.volume9de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozinteraktive, elektronische Mediende
dc.subject.classozInteractive, electronic Mediaen
dc.subject.classozMedieninhalte, Aussagenforschungde
dc.subject.classozMedia Contents, Content Analysisen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo301-312de
internal.identifier.classoz1080404
internal.identifier.classoz1080405
internal.identifier.journal793
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
dc.source.issuetopicDisinformation and Democracy: Media Strategies and Audience Attitudesde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3433de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3433
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record