Zur Kurzanzeige

[Zeitschriftenartikel]

dc.contributor.authorVizoso, Ángelde
dc.contributor.authorVaz-Álvarez, Martínde
dc.contributor.authorLópez-García, Xoséde
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T06:26:38Z
dc.date.available2022-03-17T06:26:38Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2439de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/78079
dc.description.abstractDeepfakes, one of the most novel forms of misinformation, have become a real challenge in the communicative environment due to their spread through online news and social media spaces. Although fake news have existed for centuries, its circulation is now more harmful than ever before, thanks to the ease of its production and dissemination. At this juncture, technological development has led to the emergence of deepfakes, doctored videos, audios or photos that use artificial intelligence. Since its inception in 2017, the tools and algorithms that enable the modification of faces and sounds in audiovisual content have evolved to the point where there are mobile apps and web services that allow average users its manipulation. This research tries to show how three renowned media outlets - The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, and Reuters - and three of the biggest Internet-based companies - Google, Facebook, and Twitter - are dealing with the spread of this new form of fake news. Results show that identification of deepfakes is a common practice for both types of organizations. However, while the media is focused on training journalists for its detection, online platforms tended to fund research projects whose objective is to develop or improve media forensics tools.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.otherFacebook; Google; Twitter; deepfake; fact-checking; fake news; information verification; misinformation; social mediade
dc.titleFighting Deepfakes: Media and Internet Giants' Converging and Diverging Strategies Against Hi-Tech Misinformationde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3494de
dc.source.journalMedia and Communication
dc.source.volume9de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozMedieninhalte, Aussagenforschungde
dc.subject.classozMedia Contents, Content Analysisen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo291-300de
internal.identifier.classoz1080405
internal.identifier.journal793
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
dc.source.issuetopicDisinformation and Democracy: Media Strategies and Audience Attitudesde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3494de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3494
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige