Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorMueller, Georg P.de
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-31T09:11:48Z
dc.date.available2022-01-31T09:11:48Z
dc.date.issued2017de
dc.identifier.issn2544-0799de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/77067
dc.description.abstractThis article presents a new approach to the comparison of the meaning of social or political key terms in different national contexts. Instead of relying on classical statistical instruments such as t-tests of the mean attitudes, the author proposes to analyze value conflicts between the mentioned groups. In international surveys like the European Values Study (EVS) the related conflict data are not directly available but can be generated by microsimulation: for this purpose the article proposes to look at the value differences of randomly matched artificial pairs of respondents. The resulting dyadic data-records correspond to simulated virtual encounters of persons with the same or different opinions about a political issue. In this way it becomes possible to measure the amount and the thematic focus of the value conflicts between the protagonists of a key term in different countries: the absence of conflicts between these groups points to the same meaning of the key term, whereas dissent about its attributes is an indicator of semantic differences. The benchmark for assessing these international inter-group conflicts are the national intra-group conflicts, which are generally underestimated. Consequently, an application of the proposed method to an artificial dataset with systematically varying statistical properties suggests that the traditional t-tests of mean attitudes overestimate the international group differences. By considering the internal ideological variation of the compared groups we probably get a more realistic assessment of their international similarities and differences. Thus we dare to tackle with the proposed virtual encounter method a real world problem: the comparative analysis of the values of the political left in Sweden, France, and the UK on the basis of attitudes gathered in the European Values Study (2008). A major result is that income equality is revealed to be an important common value of the political left in the three countries mentioned. Finally, the article points to the possibility of comparing different intra-national groups with regard to their ideologies. By the virtual encounter method it is possible to focus the analysis on a particular country and compare e.g. its national parties or different generations of partisans.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.othermicrosimulation; virtual encounters; interview data; political semantics; left ideologies; European Values Study (EVS) 2008de
dc.titleOn the Use of Microsimulation for Investigating Ideological Dissent: Exemplary Analyses of the Values of the European Political Leftde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalAsk: Research and Methods
dc.source.volume26de
dc.publisher.countryPOLde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozSimulationde
dc.subject.thesozsimulationen
dc.subject.thesozNetzwerkanalysede
dc.subject.thesoznetwork analysisen
dc.subject.thesozInterviewde
dc.subject.thesozinterviewen
dc.subject.thesozDatende
dc.subject.thesozdataen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Linkede
dc.subject.thesozpolitical leften
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Einstellungde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical attitudeen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Sicherungde
dc.subject.thesozsocial securityen
dc.subject.thesozEinkommensunterschiedde
dc.subject.thesozdifference in incomeen
dc.subject.thesozvergleichende Forschungde
dc.subject.thesozcomparative researchen
dc.subject.thesozSchwedende
dc.subject.thesozSwedenen
dc.subject.thesozFrankreichde
dc.subject.thesozFranceen
dc.subject.thesozGroßbritanniende
dc.subject.thesozGreat Britainen
dc.subject.thesozEVSde
dc.subject.thesozEVSen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-77067-7
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037865
internal.identifier.thesoz10053147
internal.identifier.thesoz10037913
internal.identifier.thesoz10034708
internal.identifier.thesoz10051240
internal.identifier.thesoz10041739
internal.identifier.thesoz10035217
internal.identifier.thesoz10041654
internal.identifier.thesoz10068092
internal.identifier.thesoz10057535
internal.identifier.thesoz10040791
internal.identifier.thesoz10042102
internal.identifier.thesoz10079761
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo61-80de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal1326
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18061/1811/81931de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort10100de
dc.subject.classhort10500de
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record