Zur Kurzanzeige

[Zeitschriftenartikel]

dc.contributor.authorPeou, Sorpongde
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-30T11:30:16Z
dc.date.available2021-12-30T11:30:16Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn1868-4882de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/76571
dc.description.abstractCambodia's hegemonic party system that emerged after the violent removal of First Prime Minister Norodom Ranariddh early in July 1997 has now given way to a one-party state, which still remains prone to tension and instability. The party system has become less factionalised and can be characterised as moving from high to medium factionalism. This development resulted from the growing domination of the Cambodian People's Party (CPP) and the weakening of the opposition parties, such as National United Front for an Independent, Netural, Peaceful and Cooperative Cambodia, which splintered and become almost irrelevant in Cambodian politics. The Cambodian National Rescue Party (CNRP) emerged as the main opposition party after the 2013 election but was then banned from competing in the 2018 election. Although the CNRP remains united by its anti-CPP position, it is still fractured along political lines between two former opposition parties - the Sam Rainsy Party and the Human Rights Party. Historical institutionalism sheds some new light on the variation of political developments among political parties and within them, but does not supplant the fact that party leaders are rational to the extent that they select strategies in pursuit of their interests defined as power or security under specific institutional constraints or the lack thereof.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherCambodia; interparty factionalism; intraparty factionalism; historical institutionalism; Cambodian People's Party; FUNCINPEC; Cambodian National Rescue Party; hegemonic-party systemde
dc.titleInterparty and Intraparty Factionalism in Cambodian Politicsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlfile:///tmp/Dokumente/10.1177_1868103420906023.pdfde
dc.source.journalJournal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
dc.source.volume39de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NoDerivs 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo17-38de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal193
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420906023de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence28
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referenceexcel-database-20@@journal article%%126
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

DateienGrößeFormatAnzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige