Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorChiang, Charles Tzu Weide
dc.contributor.authorKamičaitytė, Jūratėde
dc.contributor.authorKoroļova, Alisade
dc.contributor.authorZaleckis, Kęstutisde
dc.contributor.authorLee, Huei-Chende
dc.contributor.authorMlinkauskienė, Aušrade
dc.contributor.authorShih, Chih-mingde
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chi-Huide
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yen-Hungde
dc.contributor.authorJankauskaitė-Jurevičienė, Laurade
dc.contributor.authorTreija, Sandrade
dc.contributor.authorBratuškins, Uģisde
dc.contributor.authorLektauers, Arnisde
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-15T09:27:26Z
dc.date.available2021-12-15T09:27:26Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/76304
dc.description.abstractThe active use of modern technology has affected the relationship between people and place. The "digital environment" and the "digital community" are becoming an increasingly important factor in people’s daily life, leading to a loss of belonging to a place, an entire neighbourhood, and a community. In the long run, this poses risks to the unification of values and the loss of identity. In this context, the involvement of the local community in the identification and preservation of historical heritage and defining the specific values of each site is particularly important. Thus, both the attraction of the local community to specific places and the revealed potential of local tourism are promoted. Digital placemaking enters urban regeneration as a logical approach to mixing digital and physical environments and involving the local community. Several GIS-based platforms and other tools are used to identify heritage values, both tangible and intangible. Although digital placemaking is emerging worldwide, its manifestations are closely related to specific local circumstances. The article focuses on the key characteristics and configurations of the digital placemaking tools within particular communities. The study tests digital placemaking practice in the historical districts of three cities: Taipei (Taiwan), Riga (Latvia), and Kaunas (Lithuania).de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.otherBaltic states; Taiwan; digital placemaking; heritage values; public involvement; urban regenerationde
dc.titleDigital Placemaking for Urban Regeneration: Identification of Historic Heritage Values in Taiwan and the Baltic Statesde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4406de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume6de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo257-272de
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
dc.source.issuetopicTowards Digital Urban Regeneration: Embedding Digital Technologies into Urban Renewal Processes and Developmentde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i4.4406de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4406
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record