Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorXavier, Ichanide
dc.contributor.authorHamud, Osmande
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-18T10:38:28Z
dc.date.available2021-11-18T10:38:28Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn2413-9009de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/75854
dc.description.abstractMilitary diplomacy incorporates measures adopted by a country to enhance its defence and security capabilities. States engage in military diplomacy to share intelligence, equipment, and resources necessary to safeguard their interests. This study examined trends of Kenya-Britain military diplomacy under four regimes. The focus was on the critical areas of military diplomacy, cooperation and assistance between Kenya and Britain, trends of trade in military equipment and the factors that have influenced military diplomacy and trade in military hardware and software between Kenya and Britain from 1963 to 2017. The study was based on two theories – interdependence liberalism and realism. The study used the historical research design to trace the nature of cooperation and momentous events influencing military diplomacy. Purposive sampling was used to arrive at a sample size of 70 derived from the target population comprising the military, ministry of foreign affairs, and experts in international relations. Field data were collected through oral interviews and Focused Group Discussions. Secondary data was sourced from conference papers, books and journals. Collected data were grouped, corroborated, and presented using content analysis. The study concludes that Kenya and Britain have engaged in military diplomacy for a long time. After Kenya attained independence from Britain, the latter immediately became instrumental in forming a military and laying necessary security and defence structures in her former colony. Britain, therefore, became Kenya's long-standing defence and security partner. Britain and Kenya signed several agreements to cement these relations that enabled the British Army to train in Kenya and conduct joint military exercises to offer military assistance to their Kenyan counterparts. Moreover, Britain supplied Kenya with military equipment and arms. But military cooperation between Kenya and Britain has shifted over the four regimes. Geopolitics and globalization have made Kenya open the doors of her militaries to more countries, especially in acquiring its military equipment. Consequently, volumes of trade imports in military equipment from Britain to Kenya have declined. This trend has been influenced by economic and political sanctions levelled on Kenya in the advent of multiparty democracy in the early 1990s and the look-east policy adopted by Kenya to cushion her from the stringent measures on funding from the West. As a result, China, Oman and Jordan are emerging as Kenya's new trade partners in military equipment. This notwithstanding, Kenya still enjoys close business ties with Britain in military circles. The recommendations point that Kenya should strengthen its military diplomacy with Britain to enhance its national security and access to military capacity. Further research needs to be done on emerging military capacity, especially in intelligence gathering and sharing.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcGeschichtede
dc.subject.ddcHistoryen
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.titleTrends in Military Diplomacy Between Kenya and Britain, 1963-2017de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalPath of Science
dc.source.volume7de
dc.publisher.countryMISCde
dc.source.issue10de
dc.subject.classozallgemeine Geschichtede
dc.subject.classozGeneral Historyen
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.thesozGroßbritanniende
dc.subject.thesozGreat Britainen
dc.subject.thesozKeniade
dc.subject.thesozKenyaen
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.thesozinternational relationsen
dc.subject.thesozbilaterale Beziehungende
dc.subject.thesozbilateral relationsen
dc.subject.thesozDiplomatiede
dc.subject.thesozdiplomacyen
dc.subject.thesozKooperationde
dc.subject.thesozcooperationen
dc.subject.thesozMilitärde
dc.subject.thesozmilitaryen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-75854-6
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10042102
internal.identifier.thesoz10035650
internal.identifier.thesoz10037331
internal.identifier.thesoz10039288
internal.identifier.thesoz10037465
internal.identifier.thesoz10042918
internal.identifier.thesoz10036750
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo9001-9009de
internal.identifier.classoz30301
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.journal1570
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc900
internal.identifier.ddc327
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22178/10.22178/pos.75-11de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttp://pathofscience.org/index.php/index/oai/@@oai:ojs.pathofscience.org:article/1045


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record