Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBernardini, Vittoriade
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-01T10:16:18Z
dc.date.available2021-10-01T10:16:18Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn1857-9760de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/75083
dc.description.abstractThe #MeToo movement has had a profound cultural impact on US society, and notably on US party politics. While many studies have addressed the #MeToo-related controversy arising from the Brett Kavanaugh nomination to Supreme Court Justice in 2018, the relationship between #MeToo and US politics before this event has remained understudied. This article, therefore, addresses this gap by looking at the role of politics at the beginning of the #MeToo movement. Focusing on the first six months of online activity on Twitter (October 2017 - April 2018), over 2 million tweets with the #MeToo hashtag are analyzed to identify the main activity patterns across the dataset and to gain insight on user behavior and participation in the conversation. Results point to the weaponization of #MeToo in the political context from its inception. It is suggested that #MeToo reflects the polarized political climate in the US and that it can be conceptualized as part of the wider "culture wars" (Hunter 1991) that characterize the public debate.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.other#MeToo; US Politics; Political Polarization; Donald Trumpde
dc.title#MeToo and Us politics: analysing the Twitter conversationde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Liberty and International Affairs
dc.source.volume7de
dc.publisher.countryMISCde
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozSoziale Mediende
dc.subject.thesozsocial mediaen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Bewegungde
dc.subject.thesozsocial movementen
dc.subject.thesozProtestbewegungde
dc.subject.thesozprotest movementen
dc.subject.thesozPolarisierungde
dc.subject.thesozpolarizationen
dc.subject.thesozTwitterde
dc.subject.thesoztwitteren
dc.subject.thesozBenutzerde
dc.subject.thesozuseren
dc.subject.thesozpolitischer Einflussde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical influenceen
dc.subject.thesozParteipolitikde
dc.subject.thesozparty politicsen
dc.subject.thesozUSAde
dc.subject.thesozUnited States of Americaen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 3.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 3.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10094228
internal.identifier.thesoz10035275
internal.identifier.thesoz10035755
internal.identifier.thesoz10063279
internal.identifier.thesoz10094030
internal.identifier.thesoz10035815
internal.identifier.thesoz10041597
internal.identifier.thesoz10054149
internal.identifier.thesoz10041244
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo33-49de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal719
internal.identifier.document32
dc.rights.sherpaGrüner Verlagde
dc.rights.sherpaGreen Publisheren
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2137033bde
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.sherpa1
internal.identifier.licence15
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record