Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorSchoukens, Paulde
dc.contributor.authorBarrio, Albertode
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-18T07:59:39Z
dc.date.available2021-08-18T07:59:39Z
dc.date.issued2017de
dc.identifier.issn2399-5556de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/74468
dc.description.abstractIn most countries, a standard (or core) model of employment relationship (i.e. full-time work under an open-ended employment contract) typically receives the greatest labour and social security protection, with divergent work arrangements receiving less protection in correlation to the magnitude of the differences between the former and the latter. However, recent developments concerning non-standard forms of work may question this dynamic. In this article, we examine the nature and current evolution of the standard employment relationship, then analyse how other forms of work deviate from this standard. In order to do so, we draw on the conclusions of the numerous studies recently published by scholars and international organisations in the wake of the growing public debate on the ‘new world of work’. Afterwards, we analyse the situation of non-standard workers under certain social security systems, in order to determine how those systems have approached the divergent character of these forms of work. This leads us to identify the main challenges that social security systems experience when faced with non-standard forms of work. The article concludes by addressing the need to adapt the basic principles of social security to the atypical features of non-standard work.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaftde
dc.subject.ddcEconomicsen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otheratypical work; standard employment relationship; challenges; European Union Labour Force Survey (LFS)de
dc.titleThe changing concept of work: When does typical work become atypical?de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalEuropean Labour Law Journal
dc.source.volume8de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozArbeitsmarktforschungde
dc.subject.classozLabor Market Researchen
dc.subject.classozsoziale Sicherungde
dc.subject.classozSocial Securityen
dc.subject.thesozBeschäftigungsformde
dc.subject.thesoztype of employmenten
dc.subject.thesozFlexibilitätde
dc.subject.thesozflexibilityen
dc.subject.thesozArbeitsverhältnisde
dc.subject.thesozemployment relationshipen
dc.subject.thesozSozialversicherungde
dc.subject.thesozsocial insuranceen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Sicherungde
dc.subject.thesozsocial securityen
dc.subject.thesozArbeitsrechtde
dc.subject.thesozlabor lawen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-74468-7
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10038743
internal.identifier.thesoz10036692
internal.identifier.thesoz10036624
internal.identifier.thesoz10036366
internal.identifier.thesoz10035217
internal.identifier.thesoz10036233
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo306-332de
internal.identifier.classoz20101
internal.identifier.classoz11003
internal.identifier.journal2063
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc330
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/2031952517743871de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence32
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.description.mischttps://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2fb67efb922f538cd5f380d65946a96e5/gesis_survey24de
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record