Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorCasanova, Madeline P.de
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Megan C.de
dc.contributor.authorPickering, Michael A.de
dc.contributor.authorAppleby, Karen M.de
dc.contributor.authorGrindley, Emma J.de
dc.contributor.authorLarkins, Lindsay W.de
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Russell T.de
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-10T09:28:02Z
dc.date.available2021-08-10T09:28:02Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn2523-8930de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/74296
dc.description.abstractBackground: Suicide is a public health concern, with an estimated 1 million individuals dying each year worldwide. Individual psychological pain is believed to be a contributing motivating factor. Therefore, establishing a psychometrically sound tool to adequately measure psychological pain is important. The Orbach and Mikulincer Mental Pain Scale (OMMP) has been proposed; however, previous psychometric analysis on the OMMP has not yielded a consistent scale structure, and the internal consistency of the subscales has not met recommended values. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the OMMP in a diverse sample. Methods: A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the 9-factor, 44-item OMMP was conducted on the full sample (n = 1151). Because model fit indices were not met, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on a random subset of the data (n = 576) to identify a more parsimonious structure. The EFA structure was then tested in a covariance model in the remaining subset of participants (n = 575). Multigroup invariance testing was subsequently performed to examine psychometric properties of the refined scale. Results: The CFA of the original 9-factor, 44-item OMMP did not meet recommended model fit recommendations. The EFA analysis results revealed a 3-factor, 9-item scale (i.e., OMMP-9). The covariance model of the OMMP-9 indicated further refinement was necessary. Multigroup invariance testing conducted on the final 3-factor, 8-item scale (i.e., OMMP-8) across mental health diagnoses, sex, injury status, age, activity level, and athlete classification met all criteria for invariance. Conclusions: The 9-factor, 44-item OMMP does not meet recommended measurement criteria and should not be recommended for use in research and clinical practice in its current form. The refined OMMP-8 may be a more viable option to use; however, more research should be completed prior to adoption.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPsychologiede
dc.subject.ddcPsychologyen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherPsychological pain; Confirmatory factor analysis; Invariance testingde
dc.titleMeasuring psychological pain: psychometric analysis of the Orbach and Mikulincer Mental Pain Scalede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalMeasurement Instruments for the Social Sciences
dc.source.volume3de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.subject.classozpsychologische Diagnostik und Beratung, psychologische Methodende
dc.subject.classozPsychological Testing, Psychological Counseling, Psychological Methodologyen
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozSchmerzde
dc.subject.thesozpainen
dc.subject.thesozPsychometriede
dc.subject.thesozpsychometricsen
dc.subject.thesozpsychische Gesundheitde
dc.subject.thesozmental healthen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozMessinstrumentde
dc.subject.thesozmeasurement instrumenten
dc.subject.thesozSkalenkonstruktionde
dc.subject.thesozscale constructionen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10057264
internal.identifier.thesoz10055693
internal.identifier.thesoz10055619
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10041769
internal.identifier.thesoz10057951
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-17de
internal.identifier.classoz10707
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal1520
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc150
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-021-00025-8de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record