Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorAbheiden, Henrikde
dc.contributor.authorTeut, Michaelde
dc.contributor.authorBerghöfer, Annede
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T10:18:45Z
dc.date.available2021-06-08T10:18:45Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn2662-7671de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/73528
dc.description.abstractBackground: Many studies have shown that sociodemographic variables significantly predict the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), although these predictions were not particularly strong. A multitude of predictors of the use or approval of CAM have been investigated in the field of personal values and worldviews, but the effects were small or doubtful due to non-representative samples. More recent psychological research has linked positive attitudes towards CAM with intuitive thinking, paranormal beliefs, ontological confusions and magical health beliefs, suggesting a common thinking style behind all these variables. The aim of this study is to identify the most important predictors of the use and approval of CAM. Methods: We performed a canonical correlation analysis on all 3480 records from the 2012 German General Social Survey (ALLBUS) with the lifetime use and opinion of CAM as the dependent variables. Results: Approval of paranormal practices such as fortune-telling, dowsing or spiritualism explained 32% of the variance in the dependent canonical variate "approval of CAM", while sociodemographic variables explained only 2%. Experience with paranormal practices explained 17% of the variance in the dependent canonical variate "experience with CAM", and sociodemographic variables explained 10% of the variance. Traditional religiosity, attitudes towards science and post-materialist values showed no relevant correlations with the dependent canonical variates. Conclusions: Paranormal beliefs and related measures are the most important known predictors of the use and approval of CAM. Experience with paranormal practices not only indicates paranormal beliefs but also explains experience with CAM that cannot be explained by approval of CAM. Female gender and higher socioeconomic status predict experience with CAM without predicting approval of CAM, but their influence should not be overstated.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.otherZA4614 v1.1.1: Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften ALLBUS 2012; complementary medicine; paranormal beliefsde
dc.titlePredictors of the use and approval of CAM: results from the German General Social Survey (ALLBUS)de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalBMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
dc.source.volume20de
dc.publisher.countryGBR
dc.source.issue183de
dc.subject.classozMedizinsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozMedical Sociologyen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozBildungde
dc.subject.thesozSpiritualitätde
dc.subject.thesozQuerschnittuntersuchungde
dc.subject.thesozdemographic factorsen
dc.subject.thesozeducationen
dc.subject.thesozattitudeen
dc.subject.thesozspiritualityen
dc.subject.thesozWeiblichkeitde
dc.subject.thesozhealth careen
dc.subject.thesozALLBUSde
dc.subject.thesozGesundheitsversorgungde
dc.subject.thesozfemininityen
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozALLBUSen
dc.subject.thesozcross-sectional studyen
dc.subject.thesozalternative medicineen
dc.subject.thesozAlternativmedizinde
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozdemographische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozsocial factorsen
dc.subject.thesozEinstellungde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10051949
internal.identifier.thesoz10045504
internal.identifier.thesoz10035091
internal.identifier.thesoz10055842
internal.identifier.thesoz10045241
internal.identifier.thesoz10040663
internal.identifier.thesoz10060522
internal.identifier.thesoz10056592
internal.identifier.thesoz10036125
internal.identifier.thesoz10062058
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo1-10de
internal.identifier.classoz10215
internal.identifier.journal2009
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-02966-9de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record