Volltext herunterladen
(519.9 KB)
Zitationshinweis
Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-72871-7
Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung
Cross-border Civil Litigation in the EU: What Can We Learn From COVID-19 Emergency National e-Justice Experiences?
[Zeitschriftenartikel]
Abstract Free movement of people, goods, services, and capital in Europe requires well-functioning cross-border dispute resolution mechanisms. Many initiatives have been taken over time by the EU institutions and Member States, both introducing legal instruments and developing information and e-justice techn... mehr
Free movement of people, goods, services, and capital in Europe requires well-functioning cross-border dispute resolution mechanisms. Many initiatives have been taken over time by the EU institutions and Member States, both introducing legal instruments and developing information and e-justice technologies to support cross-border judicial litigation and cooperation. Unfortunately, the results so far achieved do not seem to be adequate to the needs of our increasingly inter-connected society. Adding to this, the first wave of COVID-19 emergency measures brought court-based dispute resolution to a grinding halt. All around Europe, court buildings have been closed to the public, hearings suspended, and only emergency cases carried out. Some hope though seems to come from this bleak moment. The breakdown of existing practices, and the need to ensure the justice service provision required for our societies' functioning, resulted in many local and national initiatives to reconfigure the justice service. It provided the occasion to experiment with remote justice service provision and explore possibilities to reconfigure technologies and tools, which in many cases had been available for years, to permit remote working, hearings and legal communication. While most of the experiences have been carried out within the national boundaries, they provide the occasion for rethinking cross-border judicial procedures outside their traditional schemas. Building on this, taking stock of pre-COVID-19 EU cross border judicial services situation, this paper explores EU Member States e-justice emergency measures and attempts to stimulate the discussion on their potential for innovation in cross border judicial proceedings.... weniger
Thesaurusschlagwörter
grenzüberschreitende Zusammenarbeit; neue Technologie; computervermittelte Kommunikation; Zivilprozess; Gerichtsverfahren; Justiz; EU
Klassifikation
Justiz
Freie Schlagwörter
COVID-19; cross-border judicial procedures; e-justice; e-CODEX
Sprache Dokument
Englisch
Publikationsjahr
2021
Seitenangabe
S. 1-25
Zeitschriftentitel
European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities, 10 (2021) 2
Heftthema
e-justice
ISSN
2285-4916
Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
Lizenz
Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0