dc.contributor.author | Dunst, Carl J. | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-22T13:44:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-22T13:44:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2699-2337 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/72595 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Evaluate the relationships between five family strengths dimensions (commitment, communication, cohesion, coping & competence) and personal and family well-being. Background: Noted family strengths experts contend that families who describe themselves as strong share a number of broad qualities or traits. Family strengths are viewed as internal resources that are hypothesized to be related to enhanced personal and family well-being. Method: Meta-analysis was used to determine the effect sizes between different family strengths dimensions and both parent and family well-being. The meta-analysis included 14 studies (N = 3,491 participants) conducted in 10 countries. The focus of analysis was the sizes of effects between each family strengths dimension and both parent and family well-being and whether the strengths of relations between family strengths and well-being differed for each family strength dimension. Results: Publication bias analysis indicated no differences in the sizes of effects for peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed research reports. Each of the family strengths dimensions was significantly related to both personal and family well-being. The size of effect for the relationship between family strengths and family well-being was larger than that for personal well-being. The between type of family strengths dimension analyses showed that the size of effect between family competence and personal and family well-being was smaller than those for each of the other family strengths dimensions. Conclusion: The findings support the hypothesis that different dimensions of family strengths are important predictors of personal and family well-being. Results also indicated the strength of the relationship between family strengths and well-being differed between the five family strengths dimensions. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Soziologie, Anthropologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sociology & anthropology | en |
dc.subject.other | family strengths; qualities of strong families; personal well-being; family well-being; meta-analysis | de |
dc.title | A meta-analytic investigation of the relationships between different dimensions of family strengths and personal and family well-being | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | https://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/jfr/index.php/jfr/article/view/578/534 | de |
dc.source.journal | JFR - Journal of Family Research | |
dc.source.volume | 33 | de |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | |
dc.source.issue | 1 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Familiensoziologie, Sexualsoziologie | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Family Sociology, Sociology of Sexual Behavior | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Familie | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | family | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wohlbefinden | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | well-being | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | soziale Kohäsion | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | social cohesion | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Coping-Verhalten | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | coping behavior | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Bindung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | commitment | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | psychische Gesundheit | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | mental health | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | internationaler Vergleich | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | international comparison | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041476 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045580 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10077203 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10038047 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10051425 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10055619 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10047775 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 211-231 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10209 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 1690 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 301 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-578 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.dda.reference | https://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/jfr/index.php/jfr/oai@@oai:ubp.uni-bamberg.de/jfr:article/578 | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |