Endnote export

 

%T The legislative and presidential elections in Indonesia in 2009
%A Ufen, Andreas
%J Electoral Studies
%N 2
%P 281-285
%V 29
%D 2010
%@ 0261-3794
%~ GIGA
%> https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-72545-8
%X Indonesia is a politically stable electoral democracy with Freedom House scores at two for political rights and three for civil liberties (on a seven-point scale with one as the highest rating). According to these ratings, the country is the most democratic in Southeast Asia. The human rights situation has improved markedly since the downfall of President Suharto and the authoritarian New Order administration in 1998. Violent conflicts in Poso and the Moluccas have been settled, and the peace agreement with the guerrilla movement in Aceh has been successful as well. Civilian control over the military has been expanded. Elections to parliament, to the presidency, and since 2005 the so-called pilkada (direct elections for governors, district chiefs and mayors), have so far been conducted mostly successfully. In line with this, the latest legislative and presidential elections, on 9 April and 8 July 2009 respectively, were mostly peaceful and considered by observers to be "free and fair". Parties and parliaments are now at the center of political power, thereby signifying one of the most profound changes in comparison with Suharto’s New Order (1966-1998). Yet Indonesia's democracy remains elitist. Politicians in provincial and district parliaments are often unfamiliar with the concept of a legitimate and organized parliamentary opposition. Corruption, collusion and nepotism, all typical characteristics of the New Order, have been re-established in new forms. Voters' links to social milieus and political parties continue to weaken.
%C NLD
%G en
%9 Zeitschriftenartikel
%W GESIS - http://www.gesis.org
%~ SSOAR - http://www.ssoar.info