Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Lawrencede
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T11:51:59Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T11:51:59Z
dc.date.issued2019de
dc.identifier.issn1612-6041de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/71871
dc.description.abstractIt is said that William Brennan, the great US Supreme Court Justice, liked to greet his incoming law clerks with a bracingly simple definition of constitutional doctrine: five votes. 'You can't do anything around here', Brennan would say, wiggling the fingers of his hand, 'without five votes.' While memorable, Brennan’s definition was not entirely original. Seventy-five years before Brennan's elevation to the high court, the jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. famously wrote: 'The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience [...]. The law […] cannot be dealt with as if it contained only the axioms and corollaries of a book of mathematics.' Some years later, Holmes returned to this idea, writing: 'The prophecies of what the courts will do in fact, and nothing more pretentious, are what I mean by the law.' Statements such as Brennan's and Holmes’ found elaboration in the American jurisprudential movement known as 'legal realism'. One of its most influential and articulate exponents was the law professor Karl Llewellyn (1893-1962). Trained at Yale Law School, and on the faculty of Columbia, Llewellyn had a foot in the two institutions most prominently associated with the realist movement.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcGeschichtede
dc.subject.ddcHistoryen
dc.titleEyes Scratched In: Reflections on The Bramble Bush by Karl Llewellyn (1930)de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalZeithistorische Forschungen / Studies in Contemporary History
dc.source.volume16de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozallgemeine Geschichtede
dc.subject.classozGeneral Historyen
dc.subject.thesozZeitgeschichtede
dc.subject.thesozUSAde
dc.subject.thesozRechtde
dc.subject.thesozjudiciaryen
dc.subject.thesozOberster Gerichtshofde
dc.subject.thesozcontemporary historyen
dc.subject.thesozlawen
dc.subject.thesozUnited States of Americaen
dc.subject.thesozJustizde
dc.subject.thesozSupreme Courten
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10045214
internal.identifier.thesoz10041244
internal.identifier.thesoz10048423
internal.identifier.thesoz10040087
internal.identifier.thesoz10053490
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo388-392de
internal.identifier.classoz30301
internal.identifier.journal1328
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc900
dc.source.issuetopicZeitgeschichte des Rechtsde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14765/zzf.dok-1514de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record