dc.contributor.author | Marcinkowski, Frank | de |
dc.contributor.author | Starke, Christopher | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-15T15:00:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-15T15:00:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1424-4896 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/71186 | |
dc.description.abstract | In modern democracies, trust in government is a key indicator of political legitimacy and stability. Drawing from theories of media effects, we investigated whether using traditional media has a negative (media malaise hypothesis) or a positive (virtuous circle hypothesis) impact on trust in the national government. We used a serial mediation model involving evaluations of politicians and evaluations of the political process as mediators of how political communications influence trust in government. To test the model empirically, we conducted an online survey among 1 115 respondents in Germany. Results suggest that the use of traditional media to access political information has a direct positive impact on trust in government mediated by people’s evaluations of politicians and of the political process. We also found a positive serial mediation effect of using traditional media on trust in government mediated first by evaluations of politicians and second by evaluations of the political process. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Publizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesen | de |
dc.subject.ddc | News media, journalism, publishing | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.other | Trust in government; media effects; politicians; political Processes; quantitative survey; mediation effects | de |
dc.title | Trust in government: What's news media got to do with it? | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Studies in Communication Sciences | |
dc.source.volume | 18 | de |
dc.publisher.country | CHE | |
dc.source.issue | 1 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Wirkungsforschung, Rezipientenforschung | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Impact Research, Recipient Research | en |
dc.subject.classoz | politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Vertrauen | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | confidence | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Regierung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | government | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Medien | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | media | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | politischer Prozess | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | political lawsuit | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | quantitative Methode | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | quantitative method | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Befragung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | survey | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Online-Befragung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | online survey | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Umfrageforschung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | survey research | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Bundesrepublik Deutschland | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Federal Republic of Germany | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Politiker | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | politician | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Politikerin | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Nachrichten | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | news | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Zeitung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | newspaper | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Fernsehen | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | television | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Rundfunk | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | broadcasting | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Hörfunk | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | radio | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Fragebogen | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | questionnaire | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Mediation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | mediation | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-71186-8 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10061508 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040090 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035302 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10052688 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10052183 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037910 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037911 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040714 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037571 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10049279 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054711 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10052870 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10034416 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10043435 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10043436 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036945 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037914 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10049472 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 87-102 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 1080407 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10504 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 1799 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 070 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2018.01.006 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 20 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
dc.description.misc | FDB | de |
dc.subject.classhort | 10800 | de |
dc.subject.classhort | 10500 | de |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |