dc.contributor.author | Kim, Seongcheol | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-16T16:26:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-16T16:26:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1476-9336 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/70573 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article begins with a theoretical tension. Radical democracy, in the joint work of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, can be understood as a joint articulation of a post-foundational ontology of contingency and a politics of autonomy of ‘democratic struggles' within a hegemonic bloc as loci of antagonisms in their own right, while Laclau's theory of populism marks a shift from the autonomy of struggles to the representative function of the empty signifier as a constitutive dimension. This tension between a horizontal logic of autonomy and a vertical logic of representation comes to the fore not least in the manifold attempts to combine radical-democratic and (left-)populist practices in the wake of the ‘movements of the squares.’ This argument is illustrated empirically in the cases of two party projects situating themselves in contexts of social protest - 'Social Movement' in Ukraine and Podemos in Spain - both of which seek to combine a left-populist discursive strategy with some form of radical-democratic politics of autonomy, either by supporting local alliances independent from the party (Podemos) or by integrating trade union representatives into the organizational center, which in turn finds expression in a representative logic ('Social Movement'). | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.title | Radical democracy and left populism after the squares: 'Social Movement' (Ukraine), Podemos (Spain), and the question of organization | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Contemporary Political Theory | |
dc.source.volume | 19 | de |
dc.publisher.country | USA | |
dc.source.issue | 2 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Mouffe, C. | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Mouffe, C. | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Laclau, E. | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Laclau, E. | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Parteipolitik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | party politics | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Populismus | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | populism | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Radikaldemokratie | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | radical democracy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | soziale Bewegung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | social movement | en |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | WZB | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10079045 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10079044 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054149 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10055018 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040672 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035275 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 211-232 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10504 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 1873 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-019-00343-x | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Postprint | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Postprint | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 3 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 2 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.dda.reference | https://www.econstor.eu/oai/request@@oai:econstor.eu:10419/224768 | |
dc.identifier.handle | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/224768 | de |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |