Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorMarhaeni Munthe, Hadrianade
dc.contributor.authorSudarwati, Linade
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-09T11:35:24Z
dc.date.available2020-11-09T11:35:24Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn2504-5571de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/70462
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study: This writing analyzed the incidence of practices of adat (custom) inequality in poor women at the social institution of Pakpak community at Pegagan Julu VIII Village. The research used the qualitative-feminism method which emphasized on the process of research focusing on women as the research subjects. It digs up their life experience. The data were gathered by using FGD and conducting an in-depth interview and observation on women as the research subjects. The gathered data were analyzed by using the perspective of the Social Feminism theory. The result of the research showed that Pakpak women were the important conservers and the doers of adat in their community. This reality was not straightly proportional to their authority to make any decisions in any adat activities or work due to patriarchal culture which prioritizes men, so that it makes women weak in a bargaining position. Consequently, most of the adat values and practices do not take the side of women at the family level and in the community so that they were marginalized in their access and control. Poverty, undergone by women, will be severer by the adat burden, which has to be born by women. This situation will potentially cause them to be in double poverty and alienation from their own adat.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherpractices; inequality; custom; women; Pakpak community; Indonesiade
dc.titleThe practices of adat (custom) inequality in Pakpak destitute women at Pegagan Julu VIII Village, Dairi, Indonesiade
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalEUREKA: Social and Humanities
dc.publisher.countryMISC
dc.source.issue5de
dc.subject.classozEthnologie, Kulturanthropologie, Ethnosoziologiede
dc.subject.classozEthnology, Cultural Anthropology, Ethnosociologyen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo50-58de
internal.identifier.classoz10400
internal.identifier.journal1727
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2020.001441de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Ethnologie
    Ethnology, Cultural Anthropology, Ethnosociology

Show simple item record