Show simple item record

[working paper]

dc.contributor.authorOwen, John M.de
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T07:46:04Z
dc.date.available2020-10-14T07:46:04Z
dc.date.issued2016de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/70078
dc.description.abstractHow may we best understand the effects of the ongoing rise of China on the future of liberal democracy in East Asia? Scholars who stress hegemony tend to predict a less democratic region, while those who stress diffusion tend to predict more democracy. This paper does not attempt to resolve the question, but argues for the use of evolutionary logic to help us with general questions concerning the regional and global waxing and waning of domestic regime types. Evolution's claims about the variety, selection, and retention of traits (in this case, democracy), rightly understood, can accommodate not only the standard international diffusion mechanisms of competition, learning, and emulation, but also that of coercion. The concepts of co-evolution and niche construction are crucial: an agent may modify its environment such that one or more traits of that agent enjoy a greater reproductive advantage. Agency, then, may be not an escape from evolution but a participation in co-evolution. Intentionally or not, rulers of states may construct niches that affect the longevity of the regime through which they rule. Intentional niche constructors may promote their domestic regime, or block the advance of a threatening regime, in their own state or their neighbors via various means. I consider phenomena to which evolutionary logic would direct us concerning China and Asia today, and suggest that China's leaders are engaging in domestic and regional niche construction to preserve the power monopoly of the Chinese Communist Party.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherKoevolution; Nische; Regimetypde
dc.titleGlobal power shifts and the future of democracy: an evolutionary approach, with special attention to Chinade
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.volumeSP IV 2016-108de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.publisher.cityBerlinde
dc.source.seriesDiscussion Papers / Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Forschungsschwerpunkt Internationale Politik und Recht, Abteilung Global Governance
dc.subject.classozAllgemeines, spezielle Theorien und Schulen, Methoden, Entwicklung und Geschichte der Politikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.classozBasic Research, General Concepts and History of Political Scienceen
dc.subject.thesozdemocracyen
dc.subject.thesozMachtde
dc.subject.thesozregimeen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozDemokratiede
dc.subject.thesozpoweren
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozRegimede
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
ssoar.contributor.institutionWZBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037672
internal.identifier.thesoz10046561
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10065653
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentArbeitspapierde
dc.type.documentworking paperen
dc.source.pageinfo27de
internal.identifier.classoz10501
internal.identifier.document3
dc.contributor.corporateeditorWissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH
internal.identifier.corporateeditor381
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.identifier.series966
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.econstor.eu/oai/request@@oai:econstor.eu:10419/149983
dc.identifier.handlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/149983de
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record