Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorČipin, Ivande
dc.contributor.authorZeman, Kryštofde
dc.contributor.authorMeđimurec, Petrade
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-25T10:57:53Z
dc.date.available2020-09-25T10:57:53Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn1869-8999de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/69818
dc.description.abstractYugoslavia was a union of countries at the crossroads of cultures, rich in diversity, bringing together heterogeneous populations with very different demographic transition pathways, particularly with respect to fertility. This paper studies the trends and patterns of cohort fertility in former Yugoslav countries, similarities and differences between the countries, and their possible clustering. Do former Yugoslav countries exhibit persistent diversity to this day, or is there convergence in terms of cohort fertility behaviour? If so, what might account for this homogeneity within Yugoslavia’s heterogeneity? We trace how fertility behaviour changed from the turn of the twentieth century, when Yugoslav countries began their progression from agrarian into industrial capitalist societies. We consider the factors related to a rapid transformation to socialist modernity after 1945 and proceed to investigate the federation’s breakup and the successor states’ transitions to market economies in the early 1990s. Our study thus covers a century of socioeconomic and fertility developments within the region. We analyse census data on children born by means of the completed cohort fertility rate, parity progression ratios, and parity composition. Our results show that while fertility levels decreased in all former Yugoslav republics, this happened at different speeds and taking different paths. Parity progression to higher birth orders was particularly responsible for this development, as well as for the differences and similarities between the respective republics. Former Yugoslav republics are clustered into three groups, where Croatia, Slovenia, and Serbia form the low fertility group, and Bosnia-Herzegovina, North Macedonia, and Montenegro belong to a higher fertility group. Kosovo remains a special case with exceptionally high fertility in the European context. We conclude that this clustering stems from a complex interplay of historical, political, economic and social factors.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherCohort fertility; Census data; Former Yugoslav countries; Parity progression ratios; Parity compositionde
dc.titleCohort Fertility, Parity Progression, and Family Size in Former Yugoslav Countriesde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalComparative Population Studies - Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft
dc.source.volume45de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.subject.classozBevölkerungde
dc.subject.classozPopulation Studies, Sociology of Populationen
dc.subject.classozFrauen- und Geschlechterforschungde
dc.subject.classozWomen's Studies, Feminist Studies, Gender Studiesen
dc.subject.classozFamiliensoziologie, Sexualsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozFamily Sociology, Sociology of Sexual Behavioren
dc.subject.thesozJugoslawiende
dc.subject.thesozYugoslaviaen
dc.subject.thesozBevölkerungsstrukturde
dc.subject.thesozdemographical structureen
dc.subject.thesozBevölkerungsentwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozpopulation developmenten
dc.subject.thesozFruchtbarkeitde
dc.subject.thesozfertilityen
dc.subject.thesozGeburtenentwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozbirth trenden
dc.subject.thesozhistorische Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozhistorical developmenten
dc.subject.thesozsozioökonomische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozsocioeconomic factorsen
dc.subject.thesozkulturelle Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozcultural factorsen
dc.subject.thesozinstitutionelle Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozinstitutional factorsen
dc.subject.thesozBevölkerungspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozpopulation policyen
dc.subject.thesozFamilienpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozfamily policyen
dc.subject.thesozGleichstellungde
dc.subject.thesozaffirmative actionen
dc.subject.thesozpostsozialistisches Landde
dc.subject.thesozpost-socialist countryen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10048377
internal.identifier.thesoz10035357
internal.identifier.thesoz10039081
internal.identifier.thesoz10044407
internal.identifier.thesoz10039092
internal.identifier.thesoz10034801
internal.identifier.thesoz10053635
internal.identifier.thesoz10045240
internal.identifier.thesoz10063669
internal.identifier.thesoz10037254
internal.identifier.thesoz10043309
internal.identifier.thesoz10045798
internal.identifier.thesoz10035023
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo229-264de
internal.identifier.classoz10303
internal.identifier.classoz20200
internal.identifier.classoz10209
internal.identifier.journal60
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2020-18de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence24
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record