Assumptions of maximal individualism in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic: ethical aspects

Baum, Ewa; Żok, Agnieszka

[journal article]

dc.contributor.author	Baum, Ewa	de
dc.contributor.author	Żok, Agnieszka	de
dc.date.accessioned	2020-09-03T14:26:52Z
dc.date.available	2020-09-03T14:26:52Z
dc.date.issued	2020	de
dc.identifier.issn	2544-5502	de
dc.identifier.uri	https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/69556
dc.description.abstract	Maximal individualism, which is currently a prevalent trend in the way many patients think, places high hopes in the achievements of biomedicine and assumes that everyone should always receive optimal medical care. Such an approach is in line with many normative and legal acts operating worldwide, including the Declaration of Human Rights. However, its feasibility and effectiveness in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic raises numerous ethical, social and economic dilemmas. The culture of prosperity and excess, characteristic of contemporary Western societies, makes it even more challenging to come to terms with this situation.	de
dc.language	en	de
dc.subject.ddc	Soziologie, Anthropologie	de
dc.subject.ddc	Sociology & anthropology	en
dc.subject.ddc	Philosophie	de
dc.subject.ddc	Philosophy	en
dc.subject.other	COVID-16; postmodernity; bioethics; medical ethics	de
dc.title	Assumptions of maximal individualism in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic: ethical aspects	de
dc.description.review	begutachtet (peer reviewed)	de
dc.description.review	peer reviewed	en
dc.source.journal	Society Register
dc.source.volume	4	de
dc.publisher.country	POL
dc.source.issue	3	de
dc.subject.classoz	Medizinsoziologie	de
dc.subject.classoz	Medical Sociology	en
dc.subject.classoz	Philosophie, Theologie	de
dc.subject.classoz	Philosophy, Ethics, Religion	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Bioethik	de
dc.subject.thesoz	bioethics	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Epidemie	de
dc.subject.thesoz	epidemic	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Medizinethik	de
dc.subject.thesoz	medical ethics	en
dc.rights.licence	Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0	de
dc.rights.licence	Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0	en
internal.status	formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen	de
internal.identifier.thesoz	10042801
internal.identifier.thesoz	10042424
internal.identifier.thesoz	10086259
dc.type.stock	article	de
dc.type.document	Zeitschriftenartikel	de
dc.type.document	journal article	en
dc.source.pageinfo	79-88	de
internal.identifier.classoz	10215
internal.identifier.classoz	30100
internal.identifier.journal	1412
internal.identifier.document	32
internal.identifier.ddc	301
internal.identifier.ddc	100
dc.identifier.doi	https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2020.4.3.04	de
dc.description.pubstatus	Veröffentlichungsversion	de
dc.description.pubstatus	Published Version	en
internal.identifier.licence	32
internal.identifier.pubstatus	1
internal.identifier.review	1
internal.pdf.wellformed	true
internal.pdf.ocr	null Page_10
internal.pdf.encrypted	false
ssoar.urn.registration	false	de

Files in this item

Name:: ssoar-socreg-2020-3-baum_et_al ...
Size:: 171.4Kb
Format:: PDF

View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Medizinsoziologie
Medical Sociology
Philosophie, Theologie
Philosophy, Ethics, Religion

Show simple item record