Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorWahlberg, Birgittade
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-26T07:57:01Z
dc.date.available2020-08-26T07:57:01Z
dc.date.issued2019de
dc.identifier.issn2544-5502de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/69396
dc.description.abstractThe recognition of animals as sentient beings in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) gave rise to expectations as to real concern and care for animal welfare and a balance of human-animal interests. However, both the EU-legislation and the Finnish animal protection legislation is based on an animal welfare paradigm, meaning that animals have a weak legal status compared to humans that makes it impossible to de facto balance human and animal needs and interests in an effective manner from an animal point of view. The weak legal status of animals in the hierarchy of norms in the Finnish legal system contributes to the continuation of the oppression and exploitation of animals. The Finnish Animal Rights Lawyers Society have therefore made a proposal to strengthen animals’ legal status by including animals in the Finnish Constitution (FC) by safeguarding animals’ certain fundamental rights, thereby providing tools for balancing of human-animals interests. This article focuses on the re-evaluation of animal protection from an animal and constitutional point of view.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcÖkologiede
dc.subject.ddcEcologyen
dc.subject.ddcRechtde
dc.subject.ddcLawen
dc.subject.otherhuman-animal interests; animal law; animal's fundamental rights; re-evaluation of animal protectionde
dc.titleRe-Evaluation of animal protection by the finnish animal rights lawyers societyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSociety Register
dc.source.volume3de
dc.publisher.countryPOL
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozÖkologie und Umweltde
dc.subject.classozEcology, Environmenten
dc.subject.classozRechtde
dc.subject.classozLawen
dc.subject.thesozMenschde
dc.subject.thesozhuman beingen
dc.subject.thesozTierde
dc.subject.thesozanimalen
dc.subject.thesozTierschutzde
dc.subject.thesozanimal protectionen
dc.subject.thesozRechtde
dc.subject.thesozlawen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10039869
internal.identifier.thesoz10060283
internal.identifier.thesoz10060288
internal.identifier.thesoz10040087
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo123-142de
internal.identifier.classoz20900
internal.identifier.classoz40101
internal.identifier.journal1412
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc577
internal.identifier.ddc340
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2019.3.3.07de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence32
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.ocrnull Page_20
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record