Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorAkimovska Maletic, Iskrade
dc.contributor.authorGocevski, Dragande
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T10:46:53Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T10:46:53Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn1857-9760de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/69291
dc.description.abstractThe paper aims to evaluate the direct and indirect determinants of the system for administrative legal protection efficiency in the Republic of North Macedonia. For this purpose, the paper analyzes the legal and institutional framework of administrative authorities i.e. the second instance administrative commissions that act on the appeal against the decisions of the first instance administrative bodies, as well as the legal and institutional framework of the Administrative and Higher Administrative Court that provide administrative-judicial protection against administrative acts. The paper assesses internal efficiency determinants for three second instance state commissions that provide legal protection in administrative procedure in the country, independently, as well as the two administrative courts: staff (administrative staff, number of elected members of second instance commissions, number of judges), number of newly formed cases, number of resolved cases and number of unresolved cases at the end of a year.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcRechtde
dc.subject.ddcLawen
dc.subject.otherAdministrative Legal Protection; Clearance Rate; Public Sector; Second Instance Administrative Commissions; North Macedoniade
dc.titleSecond instance administrative commissions and the administrative courts efficiency in the Republic of North Macedoniade
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Liberty and International Affairs
dc.source.volume6de
dc.publisher.countryMISC
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozJustizde
dc.subject.classozJudiciaryen
dc.subject.thesozSüdosteuropade
dc.subject.thesozSoutheastern Europeen
dc.subject.thesozRechtswesende
dc.subject.thesozlegal systemen
dc.subject.thesozJustizde
dc.subject.thesozjudiciaryen
dc.subject.thesozVerwaltungsgerichtde
dc.subject.thesozadministrative courten
dc.subject.thesozVerwaltungsverfahrende
dc.subject.thesozadministrative procedureen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-69291-2
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 3.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 3.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037601
internal.identifier.thesoz10056219
internal.identifier.thesoz10048423
internal.identifier.thesoz10045070
internal.identifier.thesoz10061115
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo10-31de
internal.identifier.classoz40102
internal.identifier.journal719
internal.identifier.document32
dc.rights.sherpaGrüner Verlagde
dc.rights.sherpaGreen Publisheren
internal.identifier.ddc340
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2020010amde
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.sherpa1
internal.identifier.licence15
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record