… Because the homeland cannot be in opposition: analysing the discourses of Fidesz and Law and Justice (PiS) from opposition to power

Kim, Seongcheol

[journal article]

dc.contributor.author	Kim, Seongcheol	de
dc.date.accessioned	2020-08-03T06:28:18Z
dc.date.available	2020-08-03T06:28:18Z
dc.date.issued	2020	de
dc.identifier.issn	2159-9173	de
dc.identifier.uri	https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/68728
dc.description.abstract	Drawing on Ernesto Laclau's theory of discourse, hegemony, and populism, this paper analyses the development of the discourses of Fidesz in Hungary and Law and Justice (PiS) in Poland from opposition to power with a focus on how authoritarianism is articulated, especially in relation to populism. The post-foundational discourse analysis finds that populism takes on an authoritarian expression only in certain discursive combinations, mostly with nationalism, while authoritarianism follows a range of different logics (populist and non-populist alike), including nationalism and social welfarism without populism (PiS) or what Laclau refers to as institutionalism (Fidesz).	de
dc.language	en	de
dc.subject.ddc	Politikwissenschaft	de
dc.subject.ddc	Political science	en
dc.title	… Because the homeland cannot be in opposition: analysing the discourses of Fidesz and Law and Justice (PiS) from opposition to power	de
dc.description.review	begutachtet (peer reviewed)	de
dc.description.review	peer reviewed	en
dc.source.journal	East European Politics
dc.publisher.country	GBR
dc.subject.classoz	politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur	de
dc.subject.classoz	Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Ungarn	de
dc.subject.thesoz	Hungary	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Polen	de
dc.subject.thesoz	Poland	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Nationalismus	de
dc.subject.thesoz	nationalism	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Populismus	de
dc.subject.thesoz	populism	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Parteipolitik	de
dc.subject.thesoz	party politics	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Autoritarismus	de
dc.subject.thesoz	authoritarianism	en
dc.rights.licence	Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0	de
dc.rights.licence	Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0	en
ssoar.contributor.institution	WZB	de
internal.status	formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen	de
internal.identifier.thesoz	10060698
internal.identifier.thesoz	10054686
internal.identifier.thesoz	10052957
internal.identifier.thesoz	10055018
internal.identifier.thesoz	10054149
internal.identifier.thesoz	10037551
dc.type.stock	article	de
dc.type.document	Zeitschriftenartikel	de
dc.type.document	journal article	en
dc.source.pageinfo	1-20	de
internal.identifier.classoz	10504
internal.identifier.journal	1797
internal.identifier.document	32
internal.identifier.ddc	320
dc.identifier.doi	https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1791094	de
dc.description.pubstatus	Veröffentlichungsversion	de
dc.description.pubstatus	Published Version	en
internal.identifier.licence	16
internal.identifier.pubstatus	1
internal.identifier.review	1
internal.dda.reference	https://www.econstor.eu/oai/request@@oai:econstor.eu:10419/222560
dc.identifier.handle	https://hdl.handle.net/10419/222560
ssoar.urn.registration	false	de

Files in this item

Name:: ssoar-eep-2020-kim-Because_the ...
Size:: 1.566Mb
Format:: PDF

View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture

Show simple item record