Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBraun, Michaelde
dc.contributor.authorMeitinger, Katharinade
dc.contributor.authorBehr, Dorothéede
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-27T10:04:39Z
dc.date.available2020-07-27T10:04:39Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn2190-4936de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/68630
dc.description.abstractIn 2012, a new question was introduced into the International Social Survey Program (ISSP). It asks respondents to indicate what they consider the best division of labor between men and women. In this paper, we propose to assess the validity and cross-national comparability of this new ISSP question, using a mixed-methods approach that combines quantitative experimental data with qualitative probing data. We implemented our experiment in non-probability online surveys in five countries, in which half of the respondents received the original ISSP question and the other half a variant with an additional category saying "Each family should find the solution which works best for them." In addition, the understanding of "individual solutions" was probed. We report on the understanding of this category.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.otherweb probing; mixed methodsde
dc.titleCombining Quantitative Experimental Data with Web Probing: The Case of Individual Solutions for the Division of Labor Between Both Gendersde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalMethods, data, analyses : a journal for quantitative methods and survey methodology (mda)
dc.source.volume14de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozinterkultureller Vergleichde
dc.subject.thesozintercultural comparisonen
dc.subject.thesozGeschlechtsrollede
dc.subject.thesozgender roleen
dc.subject.thesozOnline-Befragungde
dc.subject.thesozonline surveyen
dc.subject.thesozFragebogende
dc.subject.thesozquestionnaireen
dc.subject.thesozISSPde
dc.subject.thesozISSPen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10047773
internal.identifier.thesoz10044127
internal.identifier.thesoz10037911
internal.identifier.thesoz10037914
internal.identifier.thesoz10073563
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-25de
internal.identifier.journal614
internal.identifier.document32
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2020.03de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record