Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorCernat, Alexandrude
dc.contributor.authorSakshaug, Joseph W.de
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-10T11:01:12Z
dc.date.available2020-07-10T11:01:12Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn2296-4754de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/68366
dc.description.abstractBiological measurements (or biomeasures) are increasingly being collected in large longitudinal biosocial surveys, enabling researchers to exploit the advantages of social science data with objective health measures to better understand how health and social behaviour interact over time. However, not all survey respondents are willing to take part in the biomeasure component of biosocial surveys, even when the measures are administered by certified medical professionals, such as nurses. Thus, understanding factors which affect participation in biomeasure collection is essential for making valid biosocial inferences about the population. Previous research has shown that interviewer continuity can be useful for optimizing longitudinal survey participation, but it is yet unknown if nurse continuity impacts the likelihood of participation in biomeasure collection. We investigated the impact of nurse continuity on nonresponse to biomeasure collection in waves 4 and 6 of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Using cross-classified multilevel models, we find that switching nurses between waves does not negatively impact participation in biomeasure collection, and sometimes can be beneficial, particularly for previous wave nonrespondents. The practical implication is that biosocial surveys may not need to employ strict nurse continuity protocols to maximize participation in subsequent waves of biomeasure data collection.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherbiological data; biosocial surveys; longitudinal study; Nonresponse; nurses; English Longitudinal Study of Ageing; ELSAde
dc.titleThe Impact of Nurse Continuity on Biosocial Survey Participationde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Methods: Insights from the Field
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozMessungde
dc.subject.thesozmeasurementen
dc.subject.thesozKrankenschwesterde
dc.subject.thesoznurseen
dc.subject.thesozLängsschnittuntersuchungde
dc.subject.thesozlongitudinal studyen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozbiologische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozbiological factorsen
dc.subject.thesozmedizinische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozmedical factorsen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusnoch nicht fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10036930
internal.identifier.thesoz10045518
internal.identifier.thesoz10050423
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10039575
internal.identifier.thesoz10039576
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-14de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal472
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2020-00010de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record