dc.contributor.author | Guo, Man | de |
dc.contributor.author | Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-19T09:36:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-19T09:36:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1868-4874 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/67805 | |
dc.description.abstract | Many observers of contemporary China notice the revival of the so-called traditional culture. This includes the public presence of rituals and artefacts that relate with traditional kinship, such as ancestral halls. This article explores a case in Shenzhen, the Huang lineage and the larger surname group. A methodological issue looms large: What exactly was the “tradition” that is perceived as reviving? The field of historical studies on Chinese kinship is a highly contested domain, especially regarding the nature and role of lineages. Therefore, we designed our article as a "conceptual case study": we reflect upon the state of our knowledge about Chinese kinship in the traditional sense, develop a tentative conceptual framework, and apply this on our case. Central issues include the relationship between descent as constructed and performed via kinship rituals and patterns of cooperation among members of a lineage and the wider surname group. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Soziologie, Anthropologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sociology & anthropology | en |
dc.subject.other | Shenzhen; lineages; surname associations; guanxi; ancestral cult; shareholding cooperatives | de |
dc.title | Exploring Extended Kinship in Twenty-First-Century China: A Conceptual Case Study | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | file:///tmp/Dokumente/10.1177_1868102619845244.pdf | de |
dc.source.journal | Journal of Current Chinese Affairs | |
dc.source.volume | 48 | de |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | |
dc.source.issue | 1 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Kultursoziologie, Kunstsoziologie, Literatursoziologie | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Cultural Sociology, Sociology of Art, Sociology of Literature | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 50-75 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10216 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 192 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 301 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1177/1868102619845244 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 20 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.dda.reference | excel-database-12@@journal article%%1 | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |