Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorÖzvatan, Özgürde
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-08T14:33:46Z
dc.date.available2020-05-08T14:33:46Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2803de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/67659
dc.description.abstractGermany is facing a contemporary mainstreaming of the far right, which has a long tradition of wanting “Turks out!” Turkish immigrants have been the main strangers in Germany following the guest-worker treaty signed in 1961, physically close as friends, yet culturally distant as foes. From September 2015 onwards, German–Turkish politics of belonging, the Turkish issue, underwent a contentious period resulting in secessions between German and Turkish authorities in September 2017. Against this background, this article asks: How did mainstream political actors in Germany emplot the Turkish issue while a far-right challenger party sought to establish a far-right narrative of ethno-national rebirth? The temporal unfolding of the Turkish issue is explored by drawing on media analysis (n = 1120), interpretive process-tracing and narrative genre analysis of claims raised by political actors in German and Turkish newspapers. In order to visualize how the Turkish issue evolved between 2000 and 2017 in media discourse, 546 articles in the mainstream quality newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung were collected. The Great Secession period between 2015 and 2017 was selected for an in-depth case study. To conduct interpretive process-tracing and narrative genre analysis of this case, another 574 articles in the German Süddeutsche Zeitung and Turkish Hürriyet were analysed. In so doing, this article contributes to (1) the study of belonging and identity by adopting a novel approach to boundary studies, combining narrative genre analysis with Habermas’ communicative action theory, and (2) the study of political strategies of adapting, ignoring or demarcating far-right contenders by, again, introducing a narrative approach to political communication and mobilization processes. The analysis shows that, in the first stage of the Great Secession period, inclusionary and exclusionary boundaries competed, while in later stages inclusionary boundaries were cast aside by exclusionary boundaries after reputable mainstream party-political actors adopted and thus legitimized far-right story elements.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherGermany; Turkey; belonging; boundary studies; exclusion; far right; identity; immigrant integration; inclusion politics; narrative theoryde
dc.titleThe Great Secession: Ethno-National Rebirth and the Politics of Turkish-German Belongingde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2437de
dc.source.journalSocial Inclusion
dc.source.volume8de
dc.publisher.countryPRT
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozMedieninhalte, Aussagenforschungde
dc.subject.classozMedia Contents, Content Analysisen
dc.subject.classozMigrationde
dc.subject.classozMigration, Sociology of Migrationen
dc.subject.thesozMediende
dc.subject.thesozmediaen
dc.subject.thesozAnalysede
dc.subject.thesozanalysisen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozTürkeide
dc.subject.thesozTurkeyen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Integrationde
dc.subject.thesozsocial integrationen
dc.subject.thesozIntegrationspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozintegration policyen
dc.subject.thesozInhaltsanalysede
dc.subject.thesozcontent analysisen
dc.subject.thesozTageszeitungde
dc.subject.thesozdaily paperen
dc.subject.thesozHabermas, J.de
dc.subject.thesozHabermas, J.en
dc.subject.thesozHandlungstheoriede
dc.subject.thesozaction theoryen
dc.subject.thesozExklusionde
dc.subject.thesozexclusionen
dc.subject.thesozInklusionde
dc.subject.thesozinclusionen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Rechtede
dc.subject.thesozpolitical righten
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Strategiede
dc.subject.thesozpolitical strategyen
dc.subject.thesozpolitischer Akteurde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical actoren
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Kommunikationde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical communicationen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusnoch nicht fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10035302
internal.identifier.thesoz10034712
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10036847
internal.identifier.thesoz10038302
internal.identifier.thesoz10047635
internal.identifier.thesoz10035488
internal.identifier.thesoz10059931
internal.identifier.thesoz10046185
internal.identifier.thesoz10046320
internal.identifier.thesoz10063808
internal.identifier.thesoz10066086
internal.identifier.thesoz10054827
internal.identifier.thesoz10054894
internal.identifier.thesoz10064200
internal.identifier.thesoz10049299
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo285-299de
internal.identifier.classoz1080405
internal.identifier.classoz10304
internal.identifier.journal786
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.source.issuetopicBoundary Spanning and Reconstitution: Migration, Community and Belongingde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i1.2437de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2437
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record