Bibtex export

 

@article{ Lehn2019,
 title = {Phenomenology‐Based Ethnography for Management Studies and Organizational Analysis},
 author = {Lehn, Dirk vom},
 journal = {British Journal of Management},
 number = {1},
 pages = {188-202},
 volume = {30},
 year = {2019},
 issn = {1467-8551},
 doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12309},
 urn = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-66489-3},
 abstract = {This paper introduces phenomenology-based ethnography as a novel ethnographic ap- proach for research in management studies and organizational analysis and describes three methods that have been developed from this approach: life-world analytical ethnography, focused ethnography and go-along ethnography. Phenomenology-based ethnography has emerged from developments in sociology that draw on ‘social phenomenology’ developed by Alfred Schutz. These developments involve the use of phenomenology-based ethnographic methods that shift the focus of research onto participants’ subjective experiences of the field further than has been required by other ethnographic approaches. This paper uses a set of dimensions that allow a comparison of these phenomenology-based methods’ aims, techniques of data collection and analysis, and required effort. These three methods are then compared with current ethnographic methods used in organizational re- search and management studies. The paper concludes with a discussion that explores and addresses the critique of how phenomenology-based ethnography conceives the relation- ship between the researcher and the research subject.},
 keywords = {phenomenology; methodology; Datengewinnung; Methodenvergleich; administrative sociology; Methodologie; comparison of methods; Verwaltungssoziologie; qualitative method; Ethnographie; Phänomenologie; ethnography; research approach; Forschungsansatz; qualitative Methode; Schütz, A.; organizational analysis; data capture; Organisationsanalyse; Schütz, A.}}