Show simple item record

On the Identification of So-Called 'Meskhetian Turks'
[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorIvelashvili, Тina V.de
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-04T14:13:26Z
dc.date.available2020-02-04T14:13:26Z
dc.date.issued2019de
dc.identifier.issn1998-9938de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/66367
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. The problem of repatriation of the Muslim population, so-called “Meskhetian Turks” exiled in 1944 from Samtskhe-Javakheti and acceptance of their national identity has long worried Georgian people. The opinions on this subject vary drastically. Depending on the political situation, this issue periodically emerges (possibly deliberately) as a controversy. Comparison and analysis of currently available written sources, special and general literature, documents, recently studied ethnographic materials finally provide an opportunity to define who the “Meskhetian Turks” are. In addition, they reveal who is benefiting from using this artificially created term and for what purpose. Methods and materials. The materials concerning these problems and their classification are based on the methods developed by Ac.G. Chitaia, the founder of Georgian Ethnographic School. They contain different methods of complex-intensive as well as generalization and historical characters. Analysis. Muslimized population (Tarakams, Kurds, Turks, and later Georgian Muslims) mostly lived in Akhalkalaki and Akhaltsikhe provinces before the exile. Prior to 1940, the religious and ethnic composition of the population was rather diverse. This area was inhabited by indigenous Christians and partly Islamized Georgians. They were later joined by sheltered Kurds, Turks, Armenians and Karapapakhs. Calling them “Meskhetian Turks” has a specific purpose and the term is artificially spread in Georgian society. This type of action does not happen in any other country. One may wonder if various governmental, non-governmental and international agencies that have appeared in Georgia like mushrooms after the rain, know about this fact. Or, maybe they know it but under the influence of the governing forces of “the new order” and wholesome funding they deliberately destroy the national identity and integrity of the centuries-old history of the Georgian nation. One should use the term “Muslimized Meskhetians” but never “Meskhetian Turks” (the diverse tribal muslim population exiled from Samtskhe-Javakheti) to refer to the population of several million indigenous muslimized Georgians who are living on their historic territory (Tao-Klarjeti, Kola- Artaani, Shavsheti, Lazistan, etc.), currently Turkey. Results. The research process highlights the following: according to the results of the study, it becomes possible to develop a number of recommendations which will help the multiethnic population of Samtskhe-Javakhethi live in a peaceful way and accelerate the adaptation and integration processes.de
dc.languagerude
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherMeskhetian-Turks; Samtskhe-Javakheti; repatriatesde
dc.titleОб идентификации так называемых 'Турок-Месхетинцев'de
dc.title.alternativeOn the Identification of So-Called 'Meskhetian Turks'de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalScience Journal of Volgograd State University: History - Area Studies - International Relations
dc.source.volume24de
dc.publisher.countryRUS
dc.source.issue5de
dc.subject.classozEthnologie, Kulturanthropologie, Ethnosoziologiede
dc.subject.classozEthnology, Cultural Anthropology, Ethnosociologyen
dc.subject.thesozChristianen
dc.subject.thesozethnische Gruppede
dc.subject.thesozethnic groupen
dc.subject.thesozGeorgiaen
dc.subject.thesozEthnographiede
dc.subject.thesozpolitical situationen
dc.subject.thesozGeorgiende
dc.subject.thesozethnographyen
dc.subject.thesozMuslimen
dc.subject.thesoznationale Identitätde
dc.subject.thesozChristde
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Situationde
dc.subject.thesozMuslimde
dc.subject.thesoznational identityen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
ssoar.contributor.institutionVolgograd State Universityde
internal.statusnoch nicht fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10039108
internal.identifier.thesoz10046995
internal.identifier.thesoz10040280
internal.identifier.thesoz10048095
internal.identifier.thesoz10042361
internal.identifier.thesoz10042834
internal.identifier.thesoz10054878
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo162-171de
internal.identifier.classoz10400
internal.identifier.journal847
internal.identifier.document32
dc.rights.sherpaBlue Publisheren
dc.rights.sherpaBlauer Verlagde
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2019.5.12de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.sherpa2
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort10500de
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Ethnologie
    Ethnology, Cultural Anthropology, Ethnosociology

Show simple item record