Zur Kurzanzeige

[Zeitschriftenartikel]

dc.contributor.authorBraun, Michaelde
dc.contributor.authorBehr, Dorothéede
dc.contributor.authorMeitinger, Katharinade
dc.contributor.authorRaiber, Klarade
dc.contributor.authorRepke, Lydiade
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-08T12:11:57Z
dc.date.available2020-01-08T12:11:57Z
dc.date.issued2019de
dc.identifier.issn2544-0799de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/65927
dc.description.abstractDue to the growing significance of international studies, the need for tools to assess the equivalence of items is pressing. Web probing, which is implementing verbal probing techniques traditionally used in cognitive interviewing in online surveys, is a method to complement quantitative techniques to establish equivalence of items in crosscultural research. We illustrate this approach by assessing the question of 'how important it is that government authorities respect and protect the rights of minorities', which was originally used in the International Social Survey Program, for respondents in five countries (Germany, Britain, the U.S., Mexico, and Spain). First, participants answered this question using a 7-point Likert scale. Then they wrote freely what types of minorities they had thought of. Whether country differences in the response patterns can be interpreted substantially depends partially on how similarly the term 'minorities' is understood across these five contexts. Our results show that people in the participating countries have slightly different kinds of 'minorities' in mind.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.titleUsing Web Probing to Elucidate Respondents' Understanding of 'Minorities' in Cross-Cultural Comparative Researchde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalAsk: Research and Methods
dc.source.volume28de
dc.publisher.countryPOL
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozvergleichende Forschungde
dc.subject.thesozcomparative researchen
dc.subject.thesozinterkultureller Vergleichde
dc.subject.thesozintercultural comparisonen
dc.subject.thesozOnline-Befragungde
dc.subject.thesozonline surveyen
dc.subject.thesozFragebogende
dc.subject.thesozquestionnaireen
dc.subject.thesozVerständnisde
dc.subject.thesozcomprehensionen
dc.subject.thesozValiditätde
dc.subject.thesozvalidityen
dc.subject.thesozDatenqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozdata qualityen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-65927-5
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10068092
internal.identifier.thesoz10047773
internal.identifier.thesoz10037911
internal.identifier.thesoz10037914
internal.identifier.thesoz10061457
internal.identifier.thesoz10049626
internal.identifier.thesoz10055811
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo3-20de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal1326
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18061/ask.v28i1.0001de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige