Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBluemke, Matthiasde
dc.contributor.authorJong, Jonathande
dc.contributor.authorGrevenstein, Dennisde
dc.contributor.authorMikloušić, Igorde
dc.contributor.authorHalberstadt, Jaminde
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-25T09:36:57Z
dc.date.available2019-10-25T09:36:57Z
dc.date.issued2016de
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/65019
dc.description.abstractDespite claims about the universality of religious belief, whether religiosity scales have the same meaning when administered inter-subjectively - or translated and applied cross-culturally - is currently unknown. Using the recent "Supernatural Belief Scale" (SBS), we present a primer on how to verify the strong assumptions of measurement invariance required in research on religion. A comparison of two independent samples, Croatians and New Zealanders, showed that, despite a sophisticated psychometric model, measurement invariance could be demonstrated for the SBS except for two noninvariant intercepts. We present a new approach for inspecting measurement invariance across self- and peer-reports as two dependent samples. Although supernatural beliefs may be hard to observe in others, the measurement model was fully invariant for Croatians and their nominated peers. The results not only establish, for the first time, a valid measure of religious supernatural belief across two groups of different language and culture, but also demonstrate a general invariance test for distinguishable dyad members nested within the same targets. More effort needs to be made to design and validate cross-culturally applicable measures of religiosity.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcPsychologyen
dc.subject.ddcPsychologiede
dc.subject.otherSupernatural Belief Scale; measurement invariance; Croatians vs New Zealanders; self vs peer reportsde
dc.titleMeasuring Cross-Cultural Supernatural Beliefs with Self- and Peer-Reportsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalPLOS ONE
dc.source.volume11de
dc.publisher.countryUSA
dc.source.issue10de
dc.subject.classozApplied Psychologyen
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.classozangewandte Psychologiede
dc.subject.thesozmeasurementen
dc.subject.thesozGlaubede
dc.subject.thesozSpiritualitätde
dc.subject.thesozReligiositätde
dc.subject.thesozintercultural comparisonen
dc.subject.thesozinterkultureller Vergleichde
dc.subject.thesozspiritualityen
dc.subject.thesozMessungde
dc.subject.thesozfaithen
dc.subject.thesozreligiousnessen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-65019-5
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10045784
internal.identifier.thesoz10046464
internal.identifier.thesoz10047773
internal.identifier.thesoz10056592
internal.identifier.thesoz10036930
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo1-31de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.classoz10709
internal.identifier.journal1433
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc150
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164291de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record