Bibtex export
@article{ Sapiro2019, title = {Understanding the Spatial Trajectories of Minority Groups: An Approach that Examines their Demographic, Cultural and Socio-economic Characteristics}, author = {Sapiro, Philip}, journal = {Comparative Population Studies - Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft}, pages = {137-170}, volume = {44}, year = {2019}, issn = {1869-8999}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2019-13en}, abstract = {Population researchers have contributed to the debate on minority group distribution and disadvantage and social cohesion by providing objective analysis. A plethora of new distribution measurement techniques have been presented in recent years, but they have not provided sufficient explanatory power of underlying trajectories to inform ongoing political debate. Indeed, a focus on trying to summarise complex situations with readily understood measures may be misplaced. This paper takes an alternative approach and asks whether a more detailed analysis of individual and environmental characteristics is necessary if researchers are to continue to provide worthwhile input to policy development. Using England and Wales as a test bed, it looks at four small sub-populations (circa 250,000 at the turn of the century) - two based on ethnic grouping: Bangladeshi and Chinese; and two based on an under-researched area of cultural background, religion: Jews and Sikhs. Despite major differences in longevity of presence in the UK, age profile, socio-economic progress, and levels of inter-marriage, there are, at a national level, parallels in the distribution patterns and trajectories for three of the groups. However, heterogeneity between and within the groups mean that at a local level, these similarities are confounded. The paper concludes that complex interactions between natural change and migration, and between suburbanisation and a desire for group congregation, mean that explanations for the trajectory of distribution require examination of data at a detailed level, beyond the scope of index-based methods.}, keywords = {ethnische Gruppe; Benachteiligung; integration; Religionszugehörigkeit; Migration; segregation; ethnic group; soziale Kohäsion; Segregation; Großbritannien; religious affiliation; Minderheit; regional distribution; migration; Great Britain; regionale Verteilung; minority; social cohesion; deprivation; Integration}}