dc.contributor.author | Gonçalves, Acríssio Luiz | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-11T12:23:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-11T12:23:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2178-1036 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/64484 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this article, I analyze Wittgenstein’s conception of the nature and function of philosophy, discussing his deflationary method used for the treatment of philosophical problems. I show the reasons by which Wittgenstein would have understood philosophy as an elucidative activity, whose main purpose would be to dissolve philosophical problems through the logical (and/or phenomenological) analysis. In order to do so, I divide the article into three sections, in which I discuss Wittgenstein's thinking from the Tractatus Logico-philosophicus (1921), from Some Remarks on Logical Form (1929) and from the Philosophical Remarks (1929-1930), respectively. Initially, I present Wittgenstein's critique of the possibility of interpreting philosophy as a discipline that, as with science, can offer a theoretical representation of some domain of objects or facts. Subsequently, I list some changes in his description of the philosophical activity, showing that until the beginning of his middle-period philosophy, Wittgenstein maintains the perspective that the function of philosophy would be to distinguish between real (solvable) theoretical problems and philosophical pseudo-problems. | de |
dc.language | pt | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Philosophie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Philosophy | en |
dc.subject.other | Wittgenstein; Russell; Tractatus; Philosophical Remarks | de |
dc.title | Do "Tractatus" às "Observações filosóficas": reflexões sobre a natureza da filosofia | de |
dc.title.alternative | From the "Tractatus" to the "Philosophical remarks": reflections on the nature of philosophy | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Griot: Revista de Filosofia | |
dc.source.volume | 19 | de |
dc.publisher.country | BRA | |
dc.source.issue | 2 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Philosophie, Theologie | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Philosophy, Ethics, Religion | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 182-193 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 30100 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 1416 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 100 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v19i2.1140 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
dc.subject.classhort | 30100 | de |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |