dc.contributor.author | Paul, Mario | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-10-30T16:01:00Z | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-29T22:42:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-29T22:42:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/6441 | |
dc.description.abstract | Despite the existence of various significant theories, finding one reliable way of analysing election remains difficult. The short-term impacts of election have gained more importance for voting behaviour, while socio-structural classes have become differentiated even further and party identification has become weaker. In contrast, the accuracy of statistical data from election polls and their coverage in the media suggested a high quality of prognosis. The federal election in Germany 2005 were a showcase for that. According to the author, psephology lacks a systematic combination of possible motives for voting behaviour. This hampers the interpretation of statistical data, because there is no comprehensive frame which restrains an overor under-emphasis of single factors. In his article he outlines a research perspective that can contribute to ease this lack of systematic in psephology. His aim is to present a theoretical frame that brings together profitable results of psephology and provides new impulses for developing theories of voting behaviour. Only a combination of single approaches and thus the resulting formulation of an integrative theory – the main thesis of his article – is able to comprehend voting behaviour in its entirety and to accomplish a systematic weighting of single influence factors. A first test for this thesis and the outlined integrative model is the analysis of the German federal election of 2005. | en |
dc.language | en | |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.other | voting behaviour | |
dc.subject.other | theory | |
dc.subject.other | German federal election 2005 | |
dc.subject.other | agenda-setting | |
dc.subject.other | micro-sociological theory | |
dc.subject.other | cleavage theory | |
dc.subject.other | Ann Arbor Model | |
dc.subject.other | social-psychological approach | |
dc.subject.other | political communication | |
dc.subject.other | framing process | |
dc.subject.other | hermeneutic | |
dc.subject.other | rational-choice approach | |
dc.title | The 2005 Federal Election in Germany 2005 – an Analysis Sketching an Integrative Model to Explain Voting Behaviour. | en |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Politics in Central Europe | de |
dc.source.volume | 2 | de |
dc.publisher.country | MISC | |
dc.source.issue | 1 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture | en |
dc.subject.classoz | politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur | de |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-64414 | de |
dc.date.modified | 2011-03-14T14:57:00Z | de |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications | en |
ssoar.gesis.collection | SOLIS;ADIS | de |
internal.status | 3 | de |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.rights.copyright | t | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 63-83 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10504 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 262 | de |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
internal.identifier.licence | 3 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_CHANGED | |