Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorHaug, Sonjade
dc.contributor.authorMilewski, Nadjade
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T11:11:05Z
dc.date.available2019-08-16T11:11:05Z
dc.date.issued2018de
dc.identifier.issn1869-8999de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/63691
dc.description.abstractThis study examines attitudes toward assisted reproductive technologies (ART) among immigrant women and non-migrants in Germany. The social relevance of ART is increasing in Western countries due to overall low birth rates, a high rate of childlessness, and a gap between the desired and the actual numbers of children. Previous literature has been scarce, however, on attitudes toward ART, and immigrant minorities have rarely been included in studies on ART. Our working hypotheses are drawn from theoretical considerations on political socialisation and cultural integration. The analysis is based on data collected in a pilot study in 2014 and 2015. The sample includes 960 women aged 18 to 50 living in Germany. About 81 percent of the sample are immigrants who originate from Turkey, Poland, the Balkan countries, or countries of the (Russian) Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). We study the social norm to use ART to have a child, the personal attitude of whether a woman would use ART herself, and the methods that they would consider for their own use. Our results show that ART is overall socially acceptable, and the majority of women said that they would use it if necessary. There is significant variation between the origin groups, however. Non-migrants show the lowest acceptance rates and migrants from Poland and Turkey the highest approval. There is also variation in the ART procedures considered for use with the migrants more approving of heterologous methods than non-migrants. The differences between the origin groups diminish only partly when controlling for further explanatory variables, i.e. gender-role attitudes, religiosity, and socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents. We conclude that attitudes toward ART are shaped less by socio-demographic characteristics, but rather by cultural factors and the socialization in the migrants’ countries of origin. The diversity in attitudes toward ART by cultural background should be acknowledged in research and public discourses on ART as well as in regulating policies.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.otherARTde
dc.titleWomen's Attitudes toward Assisted Reproductive Technologies - A Pilot Study among Migrant Minorities and Non-migrants in Germanyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalComparative Population Studies - Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft
dc.source.volume43de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.subject.classozFamily Sociology, Sociology of Sexual Behavioren
dc.subject.classozFamiliensoziologie, Sexualsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozPopulation Studies, Sociology of Populationen
dc.subject.classozBevölkerungde
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozReproduktionsmedizinde
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Normde
dc.subject.thesozcultural factorsen
dc.subject.thesozattitudeen
dc.subject.thesozmigranten
dc.subject.thesozFraude
dc.subject.thesozFamiliede
dc.subject.thesozgender roleen
dc.subject.thesozkulturelle Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozMigrantde
dc.subject.thesozsozialer Statusde
dc.subject.thesozsocial normen
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozSozialisationde
dc.subject.thesozsocializationen
dc.subject.thesozwomanen
dc.subject.thesozGeschlechtsrollede
dc.subject.thesozfamilyen
dc.subject.thesozreproductive medicineen
dc.subject.thesozsocial statusen
dc.subject.thesozEinstellungde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10041476
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10038331
internal.identifier.thesoz10045240
internal.identifier.thesoz10036871
internal.identifier.thesoz10038633
internal.identifier.thesoz10044127
internal.identifier.thesoz10056831
internal.identifier.thesoz10051955
internal.identifier.thesoz10045314
internal.identifier.thesoz10036125
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo343-370de
internal.identifier.classoz10209
internal.identifier.classoz10303
internal.identifier.journal60
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2019-06ende
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence24
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record