Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xuede
dc.contributor.authorWarner, Mildred E.de
dc.contributor.authorFirestone, Stephaniede
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-03T11:49:41Z
dc.date.available2019-07-03T11:49:41Z
dc.date.issued2019de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/63074
dc.description.abstractThe rapid pace of population aging in cities around the world demands that planners design communities that are livable for people of all ages and abilities. In 2017, to assess progress toward this end, AARP and the International Division of the American Planning Association conducted a global survey of planners on their efforts to incorporate a livable-communityfor-all-ages approach into their work. The survey of 559 planners measured motivators, barriers, strategies for engagement and practices facilitating planners’ work on livable communities for all ages (LCA). Using the international survey, we analyze factors driving local governments’ actions to advance LCA, and factors driving outcomes incorporating a livablecommunity-for-all-ages approach in planning practices. We show how these differ between the US and non-US respondents, including how US suburbs and rural areas lag in actions toward LCA. Regression results show that local motivations such as awareness of substantial growth in older populations is a primary factor motivating local governments to take more actions. While physical design is a critical part of the solution, we find that facilitating practices and community engagement in the process are key to advancing planning for age-friendly communities. Additionally, communities that practice more traditional approaches to planning and have limited resources actually exhibit a higher level of LCA outcomes. This suggests that focusing on community engagement and facilitating practices could be a promising approach to incorporating an all age lens in planning practices.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherage-friendly community; government; inclusive engagement; livability; planningde
dc.titleOvercoming Barriers to Livability for All Ages: Inclusivity Is the Keyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1892de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume4de
dc.publisher.countryPRT
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.subject.classozGerontologie, Alterssoziologiede
dc.subject.classozGerontologyen
dc.subject.thesozAlternde
dc.subject.thesozagingen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10035269
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo31-42de
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.classoz20300
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.source.issuetopicThe City, Aging and Urban Planningde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i2.1892de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1892
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record