Bibtex export

 

@article{ Schanze2019,
 title = {Undercoverage of the elderly institutionalized population: The risk of biased estimates and the potentials of weighting},
 author = {Schanze, Jan-Lucas and Zins, Stefan},
 journal = {Survey Methods: Insights from the Field},
 pages = {1-19},
 year = {2019},
 issn = {2296-4754},
 doi = {https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2019-00017},
 abstract = {In most social surveys, the elderly institutionalized population is not part of the target population because it
is considered as hard-to-reach and hard-to-interview. The deliberate exclusion of institutionalized elderly
from survey samples might cause bias, like previous studies investigating institutionalized elderly persons
and their transition to institutions implied. We use a Monte Carlo simulation based on cross-national
samples of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) to test whether the
noncoverage and undercoverage of the elderly institutionalized population lead to biased estimates.
Moreover, we examined to what extent weights could be used to correct for the underrepresentation of the
institutionalized population. Our results show that noncoverage leads to biased estimates in two healthrelated
variables. With respect to undercoverage, the precision of all estimates is better, especially if
weights accounting for the hard-to-survey population are applied.},
 keywords = {simulation; Datengewinnung; random sample; sample; Europe; alter Mensch; retirement home for the elderly; survey; weighting; Pflegeheim; Schätzung; Befragung; Simulation; Zufallsauswahl; Europa; Altenheim; elderly; Stichprobe; Gewichtung; survey research; data capture; estimation; Umfrageforschung; nursing home}}