Новації у сфері управління діяльністю прокуратури

Abstract

The aim of the research is the analysis of efficiency of the processes associated with the innovations in the sphere of activity of the prosecution service during the reform of the law enforcement system of the state, the study of important factors of reformatting and dynamics in further changes in the system. To achieve the goal, we used a set of methods: comparative, of structural analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction. The processes associated with the realignment of the law enforcement institutions of the state were analyzed with their legal status clarified. The directions for reformatting of the law enforcement institutions of the state were identified, the innovations in the management of the law enforcement activity during the reform of law enforcement areas were illustrated: formation of new principles of personnel policy of the department (independent and transparent competitive mechanism of appointments to vacant positions), arranging the system of motivation, increasing the level of independence in decision making, getting rid of not inherent functions and improving the disciplinary liability of employees. It was noted that the reforms in the field of management of the law enforcement service were carried out with regard to international experience and the European standards of law enforcement. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the review of innovations in the sphere of the law enforcement activity in the period of radical reform of the society: formation of new principles of personnel policy in the department, independent and transparent competitive mechanism of appointments to vacant positions, arrangement of system of motivation, improvement in monitoring systems, increase in the level of independence of employees in decision–making, freeing employees from the unofficial "pressure" by the leadership, organization of independent and democratic bodies of the law enforcement service - Council of prosecutors and qualification board, getting rid of not inherent functions (general supervision over the law) and increase in disciplinary responsibility. Practical significance of the obtained results allows taking the conclusions into account in further reformatting of the prosecution service to a new law enforcement structure that meets the requirements of a legal state. Further research in this direction will contribute to the search for innovative ways of solving the problems of the reform of law enforcement system of our state.