Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorVanderose, Benoîtde
dc.contributor.authorSnoeck, Moniquede
dc.contributor.authorClarinval, Antoinede
dc.contributor.authorSimonofski, Anthonyde
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-29T07:38:25Z
dc.date.available2019-01-29T07:38:25Z
dc.date.issued2018de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2439de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/61146
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, information and communication technologies (ICT) have allowed governments to improve their internal functioning and to improve the delivery of information and services to their users. This application of ICT in governments has been conceptualized as "e-government". However, more recently, smart cities emerged as a locally-embedded paradigm that proposes the design of innovative solutions across all domains of our everyday life (mobility, environment, economy, education, quality of life, and governance) with ICT as an enabler. In their recent evolutions, these two concepts have advocated for increased involvement of their stakeholders (citizens, businesses, public servants, etc.) through user-participation methods to support the design of their projects. This article intends to examine how these methods impact an e-government project and, more particularly, to find out which challenges and benefits practitioners experience. In order to reach that goal, we studied the case of the city of La Louvière (Belgium) through a one year plus study following action research’s best practices. This article contributes at several levels. First, it describes the challenges and benefits experienced with participation methods in a concrete project. Second, it proposes an e-government implementation process enhanced with these methods. Third, this article discusses the similarities and differences between e-government and smart cities through the lens of participation methods.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.ddcTechnik, Technologiede
dc.subject.ddcTechnology (Applied sciences)en
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.titleThe impact of user participation methods on e-government projects: the case of La Louvière, Belgiumde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1657de
dc.source.journalMedia and Communication
dc.source.volume6de
dc.publisher.countryMISC
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozMedienökonomie, Medientechnikde
dc.subject.classozMedia Economics, Media Technologyen
dc.subject.classozTechnikfolgenabschätzungde
dc.subject.classozTechnology Assessmenten
dc.subject.classozSiedlungssoziologie, Stadtsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozSociology of Settlements and Housing, Urban Sociologyen
dc.subject.classozWissenschaftssoziologie, Wissenschaftsforschung, Technikforschung, Techniksoziologiede
dc.subject.classozSociology of Science, Sociology of Technology, Research on Science and Technologyen
dc.subject.thesozKommunikationstechnologiede
dc.subject.thesozBürgerde
dc.subject.thesozinformation technologyen
dc.subject.thesozneue Technologiede
dc.subject.thesozAktionsforschungde
dc.subject.thesozcommunicationen
dc.subject.thesozKommunikationde
dc.subject.thesozPartizipationde
dc.subject.thesozBeteiligungde
dc.subject.thesozMethodede
dc.subject.thesozmethoden
dc.subject.thesozStadtde
dc.subject.thesoznew technologyen
dc.subject.thesozuseren
dc.subject.thesoztownen
dc.subject.thesozcommunication technologyen
dc.subject.thesozInformationstechnologiede
dc.subject.thesozelectronic governmenten
dc.subject.thesozparticipationen
dc.subject.thesozElectronic Governmentde
dc.subject.thesozcitizenen
dc.subject.thesozaction researchen
dc.subject.thesozBenutzerde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10036077
internal.identifier.thesoz10034987
internal.identifier.thesoz10039942
internal.identifier.thesoz10047425
internal.identifier.thesoz10036076
internal.identifier.thesoz10036452
internal.identifier.thesoz10035815
internal.identifier.thesoz10035149
internal.identifier.thesoz10039200
internal.identifier.thesoz10065813
internal.identifier.thesoz10035389
internal.identifier.thesoz10053171
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo175-186de
internal.identifier.classoz1080412
internal.identifier.classoz20800
internal.identifier.classoz10213
internal.identifier.classoz10220
internal.identifier.journal793
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
internal.identifier.ddc600
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.source.issuetopicE-government and smart cities: theoretical reflections and case studiesde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1657de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1657
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record