'Why has economics turned out this way?' A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics (new version)

Heise, Arne

[working paper]

dc.contributor.author	Heise, Arne	de
dc.date.accessioned	2018-10-30T13:50:49Z
dc.date.available	2018-10-30T13:50:49Z
dc.date.issued	2016	de
dc.identifier.issn	1868-4947	de
dc.identifier.uri	https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/59886
dc.description.abstract	The economic science has - lamented by some, applauded by others - turned into a monistic discipline. In this short research note, a socio-economic answer to the question of why this happened is provided by combining an economic approach to the market for economic ideas with a sociological approach of a scientific (power) field.	de
dc.language	en	de
dc.subject.ddc	Wirtschaft	de
dc.subject.ddc	Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie	de
dc.subject.ddc	Social sciences, sociology, anthropology	en
dc.subject.ddc	Economics	en
dc.subject.other	monism	de
dc.title	'Why has economics turned out this way?' A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics (new version)	de
dc.description.review	begutachtet	de
dc.description.review	reviewed	en
dc.source.volume	52	de
dc.publisher.country	DEU
dc.publisher.city	Hamburg	de
dc.source.series	ZÖSS Discussion Paper
dc.subject.classoz	Wissenschaftstheorie, Wissenschaftsphilosophie, Wissenschaftslogik, Ethik der Sozialwissenschaften	de
dc.subject.classoz	Philosophy of Science, Theory of Science, Methodology, Ethics of the Social Sciences	en
dc.subject.classoz	Political Economy	en
dc.subject.classoz	Volkswirtschaftslehre	de
dc.subject.thesoz	pluralism	en
dc.subject.thesoz	soziologische Theorie	de
dc.subject.thesoz	Wirtschaftswissenschaft	de
dc.subject.thesoz	economics	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Regulierung	de
dc.subject.thesoz	socioeconomic factors	en
dc.subject.thesoz	sozioökonomische Faktoren	de
dc.subject.thesoz	ökonomische Theorie	de
dc.subject.thesoz	sociological theory	en
dc.subject.thesoz	regulation	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Standardisierung	de
dc.subject.thesoz	standardization (meth.)	en
dc.subject.thesoz	economic theory	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Pluralismus	de
dc.identifier.urn	urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-59886-1
dc.rights.licence	Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung	de
dc.rights.licence	Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications	en
internal.status	formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen	de
internal.identifier.thesoz	10039018
internal.identifier.thesoz	10037438
internal.identifier.thesoz	10054669
internal.identifier.thesoz	10036673
internal.identifier.thesoz	10039952
internal.identifier.thesoz	10059158
internal.identifier.thesoz	10053635
dc.type.stock	monograph	de
dc.type.document	Arbeitspapier	de
dc.type.document	working paper	en
dc.source.pageinfo	11	de
internal.identifier.classoz	10102
internal.identifier.classoz	1090300
internal.identifier.document	3
dc.contributor.corporateeditor	Universität Hamburg, Fak. Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, FB Sozialökonomie, Zentrum für Ökonomische und Soziologische Studien (ZÖSS)
internal.identifier.corporateeditor	337
internal.identifier.ddc	300
internal.identifier.ddc	330
dc.description.pubstatus	Published Version	en
dc.description.pubstatus	Veröffentlichungsversion	de
internal.identifier.licence	3
internal.identifier.pubstatus	1
internal.identifier.review	2
internal.identifier.series	627
internal.pdf.wellformed	true
internal.pdf.ocr	null Page_2 Page_18
internal.pdf.encrypted	false

Files in this item

Name:: ssoar-2016-heise-Why_has_econo ...
Size:: 384.9Kb
Format:: PDF

View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Wissenschaftstheorie, Wissenschaftsphilosophie, Wissenschaftslogik, Ethik der Sozialwissenschaften
Philosophy of Science, Theory of Science, Methodology, Ethics of the Social Sciences
Volkswirtschaftslehre (allgemein)
Political Economy (general)

Show simple item record