dc.contributor.author | Heise, Arne | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-30T13:40:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-10-30T13:40:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1868-4947 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/59885 | |
dc.description.abstract | The state of contemporary economics had been a subject of discussion even before the most recent global financial crisis. The one-sidedness of the discipline has frequently been lamented and calls are often made for its pluralisation. Nevertheless, there is neither a consensus over the form of pluralism that is required (whether this is a theory, method, or paradigm pluralism, for example), nor agreement among economists over the underlying diagnosis of a lack of pluralism. Even the justification for this pluralistic norm - i.e. whether it should be seen in terms of an ethics of fairness and tolerance or as the imperative of academic freedom - remains disputed and is often unclear. The present paper aims to shed some light on these ambiguities. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Wirtschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Economics | en |
dc.subject.other | philosophy of science; heterodoxy; orthodoxy; mainstream | de |
dc.title | Pluralism in Economics: Inquiries into a Daedalean Concept | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet | de |
dc.description.review | reviewed | en |
dc.source.volume | 51 | de |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | |
dc.publisher.city | Hamburg | de |
dc.source.series | ZÖSS Discussion Paper | |
dc.subject.classoz | Wissenschaftstheorie, Wissenschaftsphilosophie, Wissenschaftslogik, Ethik der Sozialwissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Philosophy of Science, Theory of Science, Methodology, Ethics of the Social Sciences | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Volkswirtschaftstheorie | de |
dc.subject.classoz | National Economy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Pluralismus | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | pluralism | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | science | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Philosophie | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | philosophy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wirtschaftswissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | economics | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Theorie | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | theory | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Methode | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | method | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Paradigma | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | paradigm | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Ethik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | ethics | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-59885-6 | |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054669 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10062479 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045191 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036673 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035127 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036452 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054029 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10038485 | |
dc.type.stock | monograph | de |
dc.type.document | Arbeitspapier | de |
dc.type.document | working paper | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 32 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10102 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 1090301 | |
internal.identifier.document | 3 | |
dc.contributor.corporateeditor | Universität Hamburg, Fak. Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, FB Sozialökonomie, Zentrum für Ökonomische und Soziologische Studien (ZÖSS) | |
internal.identifier.corporateeditor | 337 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 330 | |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 3 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 2 | |
internal.identifier.series | 627 | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.ocr | null Page_2 | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |